Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL News


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, t96 said:

Like the fumble recovery in the first quarter.... Sure GB gets more calls than teams like us but nowhere near the darlings like the Niners, Pats, Broncos, etc.

Let's not forget the ones that went the Cowboy's way back in the day.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not sure whether I want this to happen or not...

 

I’ve decided I’m pulling for GB and KC out of the 4 left. GB cause the city owns the team and KC cause Reid probably deserves a Lombardi at some point. If they play each other I’ll pull for KC on the theory that Reid has to retire at some point,the city of GB does not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And Seattle thinks they got screwed... 

More than one person has pointed out that perhaps if they'd gone with the same game plan in the first half that they used in the second, it might not have come down to this.

Clete Blakeman need I say more? And they did get screwed, I knew it immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, if they had went for it and made it and then got the td, they only lose 51-35.  But that has to be taken out of context. 

Not that they didn't go for it, that they didn't have a play for it.

How does an NFL head coach not have a play in the game plan for that situation? I'm guessing it was assumed they'd just kick a field goal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...