Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We won't allow Cam to show what he can do with innovative offensive coaching?


(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Recommended Posts

Just now, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

No, man .. we aren't cutting Cam before we see him with coaches other than the coach you think is God awful

You don't want to see what Cam can do with not God awful coaching?

This team is not being built around Cam Newton.  Accept it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

I'm shocked you think so lowly of Cam that you don't think this franchise should give him a shot with some of footballs most innovative offensive coaching

I'm shocked you're so judgemental when you only.know how to talk out of your ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Never said anything like that.  What I did say is that I would not count on Cam being in the equation going forward.

It’s like having a conversation with mainstream news with some of these folks. State the obvious and all of a sudden you’re a racist or you wish ill will toward someone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

It’s like having a conversation with mainstream news with some of these folks. State the obvious and all of a sudden you’re a racist or you wish ill will toward someone. 

If you don't love and worship this player as much as me you're a hater/racist/idiot take your pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...