Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading for Okung wasn’t as bad of a decision As many people think.


dcpanther89

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

Just to clarify, we can cut Okung with no cap hit and save the $13 million if we so choose. The Chargers are responsible for the $3 million you're quoting, whether we keep him or not. And thus we are paying Okung $13 million, not 16. Your general point stands; it's just even better than how you presented it.

Thanks for clearing that up for me. And yes, it is even better than I thought. It really is a no lose situation. (Unless Trai suddenly becomes the best guard in the league.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sharkkiller said:

I agree with you. It was a stupid comment to make, but I just don't think it was racially motivated.

I don’t fully think it was I just found it unnecessary to make a snide remark about English not being a first language. Clearly my post was lazy not blatant ignorance for English lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dcpanther89 said:

I don’t fully think it was I just found it unnecessary to make a snide remark about English not being a first language. Clearly my post was lazy not blatant ignorance for English lol. 

We are on the same page, my friend.

 

Back to football, I really hope this trade works out. But I do think it was done based on sound planning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes a change in scenery can make a difference especially when you play for a former coach who knows your strengths .  We can replace a guard much easier than a LT so I see this as a win for the team and Cam . It also provides depth as we can work in Little bit by bit .   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m expecting some more moves to be happening leading up to the draft. I hope we actually get more depth and potential pieces in FA and then get best players available at positions of need in the draft. So we can roll over some of the cap savings or give extensions for the core we want to keep before their rookie contracts are up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When you analyze what Tulsky has done the only positive was getting Ehlers, he blew the Gentzel signing, whiffed on Rantanan, signed Miller who is a terrible fit, never addressed the goalie problem, signing a declining Freddie instead, and wasted a ton of cap space this year with inaction. My verdict is he might be great at analytics but sucks as a general manager.  
    • If you think the refs we have are bad, you probably don't remember just how bad it got the last time they used replacement refs... including an incident of a Packers fan ref massively influencing a game. The NFL, when you consider all the other things tied to it like TV rights, betting, stadiums (construction, ticket prices, heck even parking and concessions), plus merchandizing, is probably a trillion dollar industry. Give the refs what they want, pay them and let's get back to having games.  
    • Probably.  You never know.  It always amazes me to think how many times they miss on first rounders (about 50%) and the number of misses increases every round.  Then there are UDFAs that make the team every year.  I guess we are always looking for the next gem--but most never make it.  Funny, I was at dinner last night and there was this big guy with a WCU shirt on.  I recognized him--that OT from Western that we gave a tryout last year or the year before--Smith.  He explained his experience--just wanted to see how he could hold up against the big boys.  He played a preseason game and was terrible, fwiw.
×
×
  • Create New...