Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Safeties should be worth more than touchdowns


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

As Alex Kirshner of SBNation’s Banner Society recently pointed out, Walter Camp’s foundational 1893 rulebook assigned 2 points to a safety without any real rationale. Unlike just about every other football rule (including the point values of touchdowns and field goals), the point value of a safety hasn’t been touched in the intervening 127 years. Kirshner argued that because harder, rarer sports feats are usually awarded more points, the safety should be worth a whopping 11.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...an-touchdowns/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NFL is currently doing everything they can to make the rules favor high flying, high scoring offenses. I wouldn't anticipate any changes to help defense anytime soon.

If anything needs changing right now, it's the fumbling out of the endzone equaling a turnover and touchback. That's one of the worst rules in all of sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I’ve always felt it should be counted as a defensive touchdown. 6 points, kick the extra point or go for 2, and then a regular kickoff. No more keeping possession and the weird safety kickoff.

 

Sorta tug of war rules.   The goal line should be where both teams score equally--who has the ball is immaterial.  Whose goal line that ball lands behind is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I also read an article a while ago that stated FGs should be worth a higher number of points the longer they are--all worth three points, but a FG from 50+ is worth 4 points. 

 

That's just a laughable concept. Football is all about pushing your way down for a TD. No one wants to see FGs. Long distance FGs just mean your teams offense sucks. Now changing two point conversations to 4 points would be cool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another cool concept would be instead of a coin flip each team would kick a unblocked FG. Whoever gets the longest distance gets ball or can take the ball in the second half. Would make kickers much more important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Another cool concept would be instead of a coin flip each team would kick a unblocked FG. Whoever gets the longest distance gets ball or can take the ball in the second half. Would make kickers must more important. 

Yeah, that's what everyone is tuning in to watch - a FG kicking contest. Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's quick. No one wants to see FG kickers play horse until one misses.

It would be two kicks. The longest would win. If both missed you could just give the ball to the visiting team. Two kicks would be quicker than one replay in the NFL to determine what is a catch so stop being a dick. It's just hypothetical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...