Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unpopular opinion. Just cancel all pro sports until a vaccine hits


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, blackcat said:

I just had a customer who was pissed he couldn't enter my building tell me that Covid was 'made up'......SMH.

Face it, we're stuck with this disease for the long haul because folks are ignorant and won't do what's necessary to fight the spread.  

Like I’ve said now at least 1000x - the Trump administration is no longer concerned about the virus and fighting it. Yesterday’s news. He has deferred to states handling it but you can’t have one state on lockdown and treating the virus with precaution and another state next door doing whatever it wants. Embarrassing How are country “the greatest country in the world” lol has handled his from the start. 
 

I don’t know which famous politician said that the US is 50 small countries masquerading as one giant one. Hard to not agree with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Your Reading comprehension skills seem to be on par with your ability to think critically. 

You asked for a link.  Be specific on what you are looking for and why...  (it's obvious you didn't watch any of the broadcast from Hilton Head)

As it goes to reading comprehension, the distinction between "pro sports" and "team sports" is clearly lost on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RASTAN66 said:

It's actually the exact opposite....there's no isolation of PGA Tour players whatsoever.

PS....the thread says "pro sports", golf is a pro sport.  The threadline does not say "team sports".

There's quite a bit of inherent isolation (in terms of being 6+ feet apart) in the game of golf. If you'd actually read accounts of actual PGA players you'd see that many are going to pretty great length to isolate themselves off the course and have voiced significant concern with what they've seen from the Kiowah locals packing restaurants, not wearing masks, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's interesting how some people will eagerly trust information that they want to believe or that is out forth by people with similar political leanings, but not trust information from an actual doctor sharing very non-alarmist first hand information. Confirmation bias is real as fug and it can be crippling.

Oh yeah it's ideologically driven at this point.

Out here in Chapel Hill/Carrboro where all the libtards and America-haters live if you go into an indoor public place you'll probably see 80% of the people there wearing masks.  On the other hand this weekend I was in Hickory for Father's Day and went to my parents' neighborhood Food Lion and I'd probably put that place at 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the anti-science crowd has been a long time in the making.   the dumbing down of america has not been an accident.  its been deliberate and its been going on since before i was born in '67.   its gotten so bad a russian disinformation campaign about vaccines has reached soccer moms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's quite a bit of inherent isolation (in terms of being 6+ feet apart) in the game of golf. If you'd actually read accounts of actual PGA players you'd see that many are going to pretty great length to isolate themselves off the course and have voiced significant concern with what they've seen from the Kiowah locals packing restaurants, not wearing masks, etc.

Again, we agree that when on the golf course they are probably at their safest --- but their time on the golf course in no way constitutes "isolation".

The NBA players are going to be in the equivalent of the old Green Zone in Baghdad circa 2005, that's isolation.

As for the PGA Tour players you are correct, they were surprised at what they saw on Hilton Head (fyi..Kiawah is 100 miles away) out in the restaurants/bars, etc.  This goes directly to @4Corners demand for a "link" (LOL) which I will gladly provide below.

That said, back to the PGA Tour players...did you watch any of the broadcast?  Players were routinely within 6-ft of each other and I saw many actually fist bump after the round.

Once their round was over they left the property and went to whatever housing accommodation they had made for the week and started figuring out how to get food...some went to restaurants, some went for take-out, some presumably went to the grocery store and prepared their own. 

After the event they'll all fly out (or probably drive in the case of Webb the winner), some to the next event, some to home...etc.  Webb probably drove home last night and then will fly up to Hartford tomorrow...

...last week the guy who tested positive (Nick Watney) flew in private on Sergio Garcia's plane.

Now the caddies, that's a whole 'nother can of worms.  Some caddies do well but the majority are living hand-to-mouth and travel in packs and share rooms in order to cut costs...and in an effort to be kind let's just say for most their ability to assess risk is exceptionally low.

Hopefully the picture is starting to come into focus for you...

https://www.wtoc.com/2020/06/21/pga-tour-golfers-criticize-hilton-head-loose-covid-restrictions-after-player-tests-positive/

A few select quotes:

"Justin Thomas called out Hilton Head residents during his Saturday press conference in response to Watney’s positive test saying, “they’re seeming to not take it very seriously. It’s an absolute zoo around here.”

Thomas added he feels safe out on the course and with the PGA Tour’s measures."

 

"Carlos Ortiz said he was surprised how open things are in South Carolina when he went out to eat one night.

“It was here by the lighthouse right here in the marina. It was way, it’s a 30-minute wait, and once you get in there, there’s no social distancing, packed tables right by each other, kids running around,” Ortiz explained in his press conference with the PGA Tour."

 

"In his press conference, Joel Dahmen said he even felt uneasy going to get take-out, because of how busy places on Hilton Head are, saying it “is wild out there.”"

image.thumb.png.cc5297dc6dfd4d0b218d6c9be01db1f7.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I don’t know which famous politician said that the US is 50 small countries masquerading as one giant one. Hard to not agree with that. 

That's how the country was designed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, blackcat said:

I'd rather not say, but yeah, we're open and have been this entire time as we were deemed 'essential'.  

 Fair enough on the disclosure.

Do you own the business?  Did you consider closing it until the risk has been contained?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...