Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Teddy competitive enough?


JABANOG

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, jfra78 said:

When my daughters were in elementary school there was a major outbreak of lice in CMS.  They are the most frustrating things to get rid of.

Big lament for parents, I know. Do everything you can to keep stuff from happening to your kids but it can be all for nothing if somebody else's parents don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Actually, Montana and the 49ers were not driving.  They had just received a kickoff and, due to a penalty, we on their own 8 yard line.  They had put up a total of 13 points in 3 quarters plus 10+ minutes.  While nothing bad had JUST happened, nothing particularly good had happened up to that point, either.  Nor was there any reason to believe it would...except he had the confidence that it would.  Certainly nothing for most of us to note John Candy was in the stands. 

Dismiss it as you will.  This board is good at that.

 

If Montanta just threw a pick or went 3/4 and out and smiled I would slam him as well and question his competitiveness. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying that truly elite players will always have a market because they're elite difference makers and that at the "devalued positions" the NFL has discovered that those are spots where unless you have an elite talent there you have an opportunity to get similar results out of run of the mill talent for run of the mill money compared to good talent for good money. The drop off in overall unit performance isn't dramatic dropping down from "good" to "JAG" and it saves money to invest in the premium positions. It's about skill sets and what is hardest to find, simple supply and demand. There's just more serviceable LBs and RBs and safeties out there than their are CBs and pass rushers and QBs. And honestly, a big part of our historic lack of consistent success has been investing too many premium draft and cap resources into those devalued positions. Yeah, we've had a lot of great off the ball LBs and RBs on our way to be a franchise with an overall losing record. Pointing to our success at those positions is proving my point because I just point to our W-L record and overall lack of historical quality at premium positions like QB, WR, CB, etc. We've sucked in large part because we've valued the wrong position groups. In a vacuum it doesn't matter. But in actuality every high pick or big chunk of cap you spend on an off the ball LB or RB or IOL is a high pick or big chunk of cap you couldn't spend on a QB or CB or WR or OT.
    • Right before Kuechly retired, we had some of the worst D line play that year.  We were ranked 29th against the run in 2019.   I remember even Kuechly struggled to get off the blocks at times because the linemen were on second level so quickly due to our porous line made up of Kyle Love, Vernon Butler and a washed up Gerald McCoy.   
    • fingers crossed for BlueSky embeds to come with the board update at least all the schedule reveals will be on the youtube  
×
×
  • Create New...