Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want a tougher perspective...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

For those who'd rather see a Panthers writer take a tougher perspective on the topic of Teddy Bridgewater, Alaina Getzenberg has your back.

Until Teddy Bridgewater learns how to win, the Panthers are stuck

It doesn’t all fall on one player or one aspect of the game — the Panthers put themselves in a tough position in a variety of ways — but being able to trust a player with the ball in his hands with the game on the line is a signature of the best franchise quarterbacks.

And Teddy Bridgewater has yet to do so. In seven of nine losses this year, the offense has had the ball with a chance to win or tie the score in the final minutes, but came up short. For a team that keeps losing and improving its chances of picking in the top 10 of the NFL draft with an opportunity to pick a quarterback, continuing to fall just short is noteworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, FeelTheBurns53 said:

So if teddy just delivered on half those opportunities, we'd be a playoff team. 

That's tough to fathom

 

Eh, if we can translate our high draft pick into a top end qb, it makes a huge difference. Forum dramatics aside, the nfl is a league of razor thin margins, both in game and collectively through the CBA. 

Other than against tb, we’ve very much been capable of winning games. Couple the influx of rookie starters, the new coaching staff and a preseason denied plus a preseason in flux, it’s a positive trajectory.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

For those who'd rather see a Panthers writer take a tougher perspective on the topic of Teddy Bridgewater, Alaina Getzenberg has your back.

Until Teddy Bridgewater learns how to win, the Panthers are stuck

 

 

There was a quote thrown out in the game about how we’re in a streak Of  0-20+ when trailing in the second half 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jacabee said:

Other than against tb, we’ve very much been capable of winning games. Couple the influx of rookie starters, the new coaching staff and a preseason denied plus a preseason in flux, it’s a positive trajectory.

The thing about trajectory is this- as soon as gravity takes over, the trajectory begins to arc in the opposite direction- negative trajectory. And the gravity, in this instance, is the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

The thing about trajectory is this- as soon as gravity takes over, the trajectory begins to arc in the opposite direction- negative trajectory. And the gravity, in this instance, is the QB.

Oh yes, gravity’s rainbow (incredible book btw). In furtherance of the metaphor, agreed;  we need someone who can handle carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...