Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones


saX man

The QB Poll: Fields v. Wilson v. Lance v. Trask v. Jones  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Let's say we have the choice of any of these guys...who's your pick? Give your reasons/team fit/scheme fit/dry your beans

    • Justin Fields, Ohio State, 6'3 228
      71
    • Zach Wilson, BYU, 6'3 210
      62
    • Trey Lance, NDSU, 6'4 226
      46
    • Kyle Trask, Florida, 6'5 240
      10
    • Mac Jones, Bama, 6'3 214
      8


Recommended Posts

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Fields over Wilson . . . barely.  I think those two are neck in neck as far as fitting the system that Rhule / Brady want to run.  I'd say there's a gap to Trask who fits.  Lance is too much Cam lite for this system.  I don't know enough about Mac Jones to place him yet.

I've been in a tussle over Fields, Wilson, & Lance.  It's just really close and I like all in their own ways.  I've had a feeling about us and Wilson just matching and aligning with what we want come draft time.  So gut feeling he's the one but want Fields the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

You don't over think this one, Fields is a no brainer #2 behind Trevor. Lance/Wilson a toss up then Trask/Jones late 1st and not in the discussion for us

I just don't know though.  I've heard in my limited scouting circle window about Jones being quite lauded.  Could be one of the most interesting QB groups in forever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Are we sure jets drafting a QB? Smart money would be to trade out.

Everyone on this forum thinks they're gonna get Lawrence.

 

Just now, Varking said:

Bro you wrote this right after you showed support for Sam Darnold... that’s some backwards thinking right there. 

At least I've seen Darnold make good throws at an elite competition level. He just has nothing to work with in the Jets. I have not seen that of Fields (who's bailed out by the elite talent around him all the time). I don't love Darnold or think he's a all-pro, but in terms of unlocked potential he's just as good as any of these guys and wouldn't require a first round pic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, qazsazsaz said:

Please put in an option for Sam Darnold. Honestly would rather have him.

image.thumb.png.daa78fba3c9683a338aa98102f3120c1.png

This is your guy?  Yea.  No thanks.  I'm not saying it's all his fault in NY, this is the Jets after all.  Maybe he'll turn into a real QB somewhere else, but I don't want to bet our franchise on a guy who hasn't looked very good against actual NFL competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...