Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2: Post Launch Discussion(possible spoilers enter at own risk)


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

These are just my first thoughts after 2 hours

Well, I Played through the first few levels tonight, nothing really eye opening other then the fact that the Ultra Nationalist in Russia won the war, seriously didn't see that coming.

But enough of that, onto the Multiplayer, first off your starting weapons suck ass and I mean big time, the good news is it doesn't take long to rise in rank high enough to get something worth a damn, maps are good, nothing really ground breaking, and for those that like to grenade spam, bad news you aren't Peyton Manning anymore.

Now, I'm not 100% sure because I only played an hour of the MP and it's late at night but I swear the game feels more tactical and is at a slightly slower pace and less arcade like, if you get what I'm saying.

The Perk, Kill-streak, and Aid Drops are wonderful, BTW Predator Missile FTW makes the Air strike look like child's play.

So far love it all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I woke up early this morning and played it for 30 mins before work. I played the multiplayer because i didn't have time to get into the campaign. it seemed pretty cool. i got in a fight with a guy using a shield. that was a crazy surprise.

i was playing against level 20+. total losers. :) jk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I woke up early this morning and played it for 30 mins before work. I played the multiplayer because i didn't have time to get into the campaign. it seemed pretty cool. i got in a fight with a guy using a shield. that was a crazy surprise.

i was playing against level 20+. total losers. :) jk

Total losers to be that high in 1 night haha. I only got to play multiplayer in-store. I'm waiting to beat the campaign to play it online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are just my first thoughts after 2 hours

Well, I Played through the first few levels tonight, nothing really eye opening other then the fact that the Ultra Nationalist in Russia won the war, seriously didn't see that coming.

But enough of that, onto the Multiplayer, first off your starting weapons suck ass and I mean big time, the good news is it doesn't take long to rise in rank high enough to get something worth a damn, maps are good, nothing really ground breaking, and for those that like to grenade spam, bad news you aren't Peyton Manning anymore.

Now, I'm not 100% sure because I only played an hour of the MP and it's late at night but I swear the game feels more tactical and is at a slightly slower pace and less arcade like, if you get what I'm saying.

The Perk, Kill-streak, and Aid Drops are wonderful, BTW Predator Missile FTW makes the Air strike look like child's play.

So far love it all

starting weapons dont suck ass. UMP45 is the sh*t!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do like how multiplayer is more tactical. Promotes teamwork. The other ones was just shoot fast and run faster. I like how the levels are bigger. The one thing I don't like is, it gives a-holes opportunities to hide in the corner and shoot you. That's annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Played the first few levels of the campaign last night. It was pretty fun and intense at times. I'm kind of terrible at it, i died way more than any video game i've played which pissed me off. I have a hard time hearing what they are telling me to do for all the other background noise.

Can't wait to play tonight. Hopefully i can finish it soon to move to mulitplayer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...