Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers also interviewed Omar Khan


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

They're going to to do it no matter what. It was always going to be too many or too few. Or the guy I am fixated on after reading Wikipedia didn't get hired.  The culture here cultivates mindless whining.

I don’t think some people realize that companies usually interview LOTS of candidates for important positions.

People just love to complain and cry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mage said:

I don’t think some people realize that companies usually interview LOTS of candidates for important positions.

I'm not upset about the number of candidates.

That said, I've paid attention to NFL hiring cycles for a long time, and I can tell you that fifteen interviews is high, way high. When it comes to GM or head coach openings, most teams bring in about a half dozen candidates at most.

One big factor to remember in this story though? Covid.

In past years, interviews were just about always in person. The team had to fly people out, find accommodations for them, etc etc. Not this year. Now you can just do it by Zoom so there's a lot less time, money and trouble involved.

Not sure we'd have interviewed this many people if it were under normal conditions.

Gonna be interesting to see whether the NFL allows this to continue in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Related: Someone on Twitter asked Broncos reporter Mike Klis why the team hasn't looked at Adam Peters (some here had that question as well).

The apparent reason is that the Broncos believe he's going to get the Panthers job.

That still doesn't make sense.  If they want him they hire him.  Why give up on him going somewhere else, even lobby for him to be hired by someone else?  

Personally that seems odd to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mage said:

I don’t think some people realize that companies usually interview LOTS of candidates for important positions.

People just love to complain and cry. 

I won't have much of an option of the move until about a year from now and then it's still likely premature and based on a very shallow view 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

That still doesn't make sense.  If they want him they hire him.  Why give up on him going somewhere else, even lobby for him to be hired by someone else?  

Personally that seems odd to me.

It does if they know he wants this job. And given his longtime friendship with Matt Rhule, that wouldn't be surprising.

It's also true they do have other candidates with prior Bronco connections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It does if they know he wants this job. And given his longtime friendship with Matt Rhule, that wouldn't be surprising.

It's also true they do have other candidates with prior Bronco connections.

Possibly, but it just doesn't smell right to me.  I am like the guard on Crematoria from the Chronicles of Riddick.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not upset about the number of candidates.

That said, I've paid attention to NFL hiring cycles for a long time, and I can tell you that fifteen interviews is high, way high. When it comes to GM or head coach openings, most teams bring in about a half dozen candidates at most.

But why does it matter though?  There is literally no negative downside to the amount of people you interview. 

It’s a ludicrous complaint. No different than scouting a lot of players. 

The fact is we could just as easily be doing our due diligence and already have the guy we want in mind. None of us no, so it seems silly for so many to be complaining so relentlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mage said:

But why does it matter though?  There is literally no negative downside to the amount of people you interview. 

It’s a ludicrous complaint. No different than scouting a lot of players. 

The fact is we could just as easily be doing our due diligence and already have the guy we want in mind. None of us no, so it seems silly for so many to be complaining so relentlessly.

Don’t you know all of these disgruntled fans know more about running a billion dollar organization than does Tepper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...