Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Multiple Teams have reached out to the Jets about Darnold"

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There biggest need is corner and they have their pick on two really really good ones.  I personally think surtain is freaking sick

Farley ain't far behind, if at all.  They could get one if they moved back to 9 or 10.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I have been saying this, although I read so much about them taking a QB, I wonder if they will. On paper, a QB now makes no sense.

Everything in ATL feels like they want to stay put and draft defense, or trade back and find a RB. The new GM wants to get the running game going again. Arthu Blank said he isnt closing the door on the idea of a drafting a QB... it's fair to assume he is just drumming interest for the pick for teams who ataully NEED a qb. They are just driving value. 

I'd be shocked if a first time head coach and GM want to make their mark with drafting a bench player their first year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Everything in ATL feels like they want to stay put and draft defense, or trade back and find a RB. The new GM wants to get the running game going again. Arthu Blank said he isnt closing the door on the idea of a drafting a QB... it's fair to assume he is just drumming interest for the pick for teams who ataully NEED a qb. They are just driving value. 

I'd be shocked if a first time head coach and GM want to make their mark with drafting a bench player their first year.

They have trade back written all over them.  I wonder if they would trade with an NFC South rival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, ncfan said:

So your saying draft a CB?

 

4 QBs and Sewell going off by 8, that's not a good spot for us.

Unless your suggesting we draft a WR

What?  I think we are not on the same page.  I have no clue what you are talking about.  QB's moving teams has nothing to do with who is drafting ahead of us.

1. Jags - qb 100%

2. Jets - qb - slightly lower but they could roll with sd.  75%

3. Miami - I doubt they go qb here.  Less than 10%

4. Falcons -less than 10

5. Bengal - 0

6. eagles - 0%

7. Lions - 0%

 

Now how do qbs changing team change any of that?

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Everything in ATL feels like they want to stay put and draft defense, or trade back and find a RB. The new GM wants to get the running game going again. Arthu Blank said he isnt closing the door on the idea of a drafting a QB... it's fair to assume he is just drumming interest for the pick for teams who ataully NEED a qb. They are just driving value. 

I'd be shocked if a first time head coach and GM want to make their mark with drafting a bench player their first year.

Its shaking where the same defensive player(s) they'd take at 4 will be around at 8-12.  They can take the same guys and still get a boatload of picks from a QB hungry team.

 

Only non QB target that may not be around when they trade down, would be Sewell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Everything in ATL feels like they want to stay put and draft defense, or trade back and find a RB. The new GM wants to get the running game going again. Arthu Blank said he isnt closing the door on the idea of a drafting a QB... it's fair to assume he is just drumming interest for the pick for teams who ataully NEED a qb. They are just driving value. 

I'd be shocked if a first time head coach and GM want to make their mark with drafting a bench player their first year.

2 years unless they cut Ryan and take a big cap hit and why would they do that he is not the problem, the falcons couldnt stop anyone last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What?  I think we are not on the same page.  I have no clue what you are talking about.  QB's moving teams has nothing to do with who is drafting ahead of us.

1. Jags - qb 100%

2. Jets - qb - slightly lower but they could roll with sd.  75%

3. Miami - I doubt they go qb here.  Less than 10%

4. Falcons -less than 10

5. Bengal - 0

6. eagles - 0%

7. Lions - 0%

 

Now how do qbs changing team change any of that?

Only 0% on that list is Bengals.

1. Jags- 100%

2. Jets- 95%

3. Dolphins- 0% most likely trade down

4. Falcons- 65%

5. Bengals- 0%

6. Eagles- 55% with Wentz traded

7. Lions- 50%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

2 years unless they cut Ryan and take a big cap hit and why would they do that he is not the problem, the falcons couldnt stop anyone last year

I mean we can only hope they do that right? haha.. that would benefit us and make them a non competitive team in division.
 

Falcons do not want a Aaron Rodgers/Jordan Love situation on their hands.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

now you are changing your argument. 

How am I changing the argument.

I said the QBs.

Then you spun it as if it had nothing to do with QBs at 8, so I pointed the other out, now you're spinning it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      Panthers coverage efficiency

      By NAS · Posted

      Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • NAS
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By NAS · Posted

      Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • TD alt
      Drafting X is like the poster board for mistakes. Hopefully, lesson learned.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...