Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurricanes at Blue Jackets Predictions, Chatter, Series Thread 2/7-2/8


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Athletic has a good breakdown.. They had people being trained on video review, the wrong guys made the call. They knew they had it wrong almost immediately.. Once that pucked dropped it was a done deal. 

The NHL should have intervened right then rather than waiting till the intermission.  Would have been a real kick in the junk if they let up a PP goal in addition to the bad goal. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forwards

Svechnikov-Aho-McGinn
Niederreiter-Trocheck-Teravainen
Dzingel-Staal-Foegele
Martinook-Geekie-Fast

Defensemen

Slavin-Pesce
Skjei-Hamilton
Gardiner-Fleury

Goalies

Nedeljkovic
Reimer

No changes besides starting Ned tonight.

______

COLUMBUS - After a scintillating Sunday afternoon tilt, the stage is set for a rematch between the Carolina Hurricanes and Columbus Blue Jackets.


The Match-Up

Carolina Hurricanes (7-2-0, 14 points) at Columbus Blue Jackets (5-5-3, 13 points)

Monday, Jan. 8, 7 p.m.

Watch: FOX Sports Carolinas, FOX Sports GO

Listen: 99.9 FM The Fan, Hurricanes.com/Listen, Hurricanes app

14: With a 7-2-0 record, the Canes have set a new franchise best for most points (14) through the team's first nine games of the season. The previous best was 13 points, achieved in 2005-06 (6-2-1) and 2007-08 (5-1-3).

https://www.nhl.com/hurricanes/news/gameday-preview-carolina-hurricanes-columbus-blue-jackets/c-321196314

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

THG's review of the botched call and the details that surrounded.

 

Whether intentional or not, THG seems to indicate that the Hurricanes were somehow involved in the call. They were not. Per the Athletic article mentioned earlier:

"Nationwide Arena’s off-ice officials are in the process of training a video coordinator, a person charged with making sure NHL hockey-operations executives in Toronto can connect with NHL officials at ice level for just this kind of review, using both audio (headsets) and video (Apple iPads)."

So the Canes had no personnel involved in the decision.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a winner? He went 6-9 last year. Just because a guy got carried to the SB by elite surrounding talent doesn't mean much. How did Nick Files pan out after catching lightning on a bottle?
    • Hurts is an elite threat with his legs though. He's gonna stress an opposing DC a lot more than Brock Purdy.
    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
×
×
  • Create New...