Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This throwback makes me happy


shaqattaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Boy...what I would do to trade up for Herbert in hindsight. That kid is phenomenal. 

*Official Justin Herbert Bandwagon Member*

I was right about Herbert. Only me and Marty were on that bandwagon. Teh huddle wasn't.

Now if only people could trust me on Kyle Trask's future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Incorrect. I was, as well. Said so at the time.

Trask isn't the guy. You'll see.

Okay, you know I did mean "most" of the huddle. Yes he is excellent. Did my homework on Herbert way before I joined Marty's bandwagon.

I evaluated Trask the same way. He's the real deal. We'll see. All bets are of till he gets his chance. Physically, mechanically, IQ, pro speed release, Drew Brees type ability to read and react. Yes. All day.

This IS a great QB draft. I just think quite a few of those high fliers will fizzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

6'5" 240lb hog Mollie pusher. Physically he's the most impressive to me.

Ya'll sleeping on my boy!

Yeah, we went round and round on that. I just don't buy your logic of him being "bigger" so that means he is better. Herbert's size is an asset but his elite skill levels are what made him a big time prospect. Trask has very little in terms of the elite skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, we went round and round on that. I just don't buy your logic of him being "bigger" so that means he is better. Herbert's size is an asset but his elite skill levels are what made him a big time prospect. Trask has very little in terms of the elite skills.

Yeah, um as far as QBing skills he's got that.

Cam Newton clone, running like a gazelle, no. Standing in the pocket, reading and delivering nice catchable balls racking up the most yrds and touchdowns in college football, yes. If you're QB is doing what he's supposed to do, elite athlete matters not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Yeah, um as far as QBing skills he's got that.

Cam Newton clone, running like a gazelle, no. Standing in the pocket, reading and delivering nice catchable balls racking up the most yrds and touchdowns in college football, yes. If you're QB is doing what he's supposed to do, elite athlete matters not.

 

He also has a slow delivery, a less than lively arm and some questionable mechanics. If you want that kind of QB, why not take the far better version in Mac Jones? He has all the polish that Trask doesn't and still doesn't have an elite skill set. 

That Herbert comparison is pretty bad. Herbert was a great athlete and has just about every elite skill you want in a QB. His questions were all related to the scheme at Oregon and him being able to translate to the NFL. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...