Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What does Moton tag mean for Curtis Samuel?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

I think Samuel is as good as gone. Don't want to see him gone and I almost feel I would rather see Anderson go instead but somehow I'm guessing the staff doesn't care how I feel anyhow.

I agree. He does more than Anderson and can be utilized in more ways. I think Anderson is a fine player but we jumped the gun signing him for what we did.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

It means he’s going to New England 

They probably would have the most to gain in pursing him. But does he stand to gain as much going there? He would be playing with cam yes but with cams shoulder issues would that be like trading one bad deep ball thrower for another?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

They probably would have the most to gain in pursing him. But does he stand to gain as much going there? He would be playing with cam yes but with cams shoulder issues would that be like trading one bad deep ball thrower for another?

Cams shoulder issue poo is way over blown. Talent at the skill positions and covid last year is what doomed Cam in. Last time he was on the field he threw for over 300 with 3tds and a receiving touchdown. I think the shoulder is fine. 
 

What does he stand staying here? Running it back with Teddy? Ehhhh Pats are in a better position to win right now believe it or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...