Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go on record. Who still wants Watson?


Sasquatch
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, jackson113 said:

Finger in the Ole Anus..😬

7BDB5E03-D970-49AC-84A6-66E91B757152.png

See I cringe when I read this, yuck. However, she stated that she would not entertain his sexual advances. He did not force it further, he did not go into her no-no square. Is this creepy? yes. Does Watson seemingly have issues? yes. Is this illegal? That is the question.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Unless you were there or there was video or audio evidence or a confession, no one should tell a alleged victim they are lying or tell the accused they are guilty. 

At best we can only have opinions. 

There is probably no dumber, more ill informed take available than "unless there's video, we can't be sure".

(ranks right up there with the CSI effect)

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, philit99 said:

See I cringe when I read this, yuck. However, she stated that she would not entertain his sexual advances. He did not force it further, he did not go into her no-no square. Is this creepy? yes. Does Watson seemingly have issues? yes. Is this illegal? That is the question.

Technically, what Jerry Richardson did isn't "illegal".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

We are deep into cancel culture / metoo. These women would have been A OK had they came forward earlier to police. As that looks better than waiting and going civil. 

You could say the same about Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer and just about every rich person with power that has done things similar to what Watson is being accused of. None of those victims went to the police right away yet all 3 of these men are guilty. 25 accusers doesn’t look good and no team is interested in Watson until there is some more clarity. Please move on....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

There is probably no dumber, more I'll informed take available than "unless there's video, we can't be sure".

(ranks right up there with the CSI effect)

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Agent Blue said:

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

I tend to believe 25 women telling essentially the same story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent Blue said:

Please inform us how you can be sure of sexual assault if 

1) You were not present to actually see or hear said incident. 

2) You have seen no video of said incident. 

3) You have heard no audio of said incident. 

4) You have seen or heard no confession of said incident. 

#goesandgrabspopcorn

Guys who are guilty of rape would absolutely love to have someone like you on their jury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Guys who are guilty of rape would absolutely love to have someone like you on their jury.

I would go off the evidence available. 

I would not convict anyone on some he said she said. 

Gotta be something more. 

There is an old saying. Goes like i'd rather 100 criminals walk free than convict and imprison 1 innocent man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Money, power and fame also help a lot of these guys get away with the stuff they do.

I agree Mr Scot. My issue is the number of complaints that happen well after the fact, as if to simply pile on to something you condoned at the time. I honestly think Watson has issues, but this just seems like character assassination or a money grab, revenge deal.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...