Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Houston police opening investigation on Deshaun Watson

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Look at these dudes just making poo up about the massage therapists but wanting no conclusion jumping about Watson. Pathetic.

Typical misogyny. It's really sad what women have to go though to just have the same rights. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Snake said:

Ok so simply just awnser the question and you won't be misrepresented. Do you think believing a victim is wrong? Or is the victim a lier till they can be proven right? 

From a legal perspective, you have to be proven to be a victim! Whether you admit it or not, Watson could be the victim here. That's why you let all the facts come out before you rush to judgement, particularly when you have suspicious circumstances and people reluctant to step out from behind the veil of confidentiality to the opposing counsel at the very least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

No, some of us actually believe in the theory behind American jurisprudence (which has its origins in English common law), even if hypocrites don't mete it out fairly. 

So now you've a hypocrite for supporting female victims though sexual assault? Or do laws only apply to men? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

From a legal perspective, you have to be proven to be a victim! Whether you admit it or not, Watson could be the victim here. That's why you let all the facts come out before you rush to judgement, particularly when you have suspicious circumstances and people reluctant to step out from behind the veil of confidentiality to the opposing counsel at the very least. 

Ok so what you are saying is the victim is a lying until proven right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

You love your straw man arguments!

You love not defining your arguments. Either say what you mean or don't say anything. Dancing around trying to not seem like a misogynist while saying misogyny statements is the game you play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

It's pathetic that you don't appreciate the spirit of the law.

Oh I appreciate it. I appreciate the 12 jury members more though. People have progressed a bunch in the past 12 year and the old Ad hominem defense doesn't work anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

You love not defining your arguments. Either say what you mean or don't say anything. Dancing around trying to not seem like a misogynist while saying misogyny statements is the game you play. 

If you're not strong enough in reading comprehension to understand what I've said very clearly, that's a personal issue!

I don't support misogyny, lying, misrepresenting the facts, or plain old hypocrisy, which is a big part of America's existence, and I feel great about it! I don't have any moral dilemmas at all about my sense of fairness and justice! You may, but that's your issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

If you're not strong enough in reading comprehension to understand what I've said very clearly, that's a personal issue!

I don't support misogyny, lying, misrepresenting the facts, or plain old hypocrisy, which is a big part of America's existence, and I feel great about it! I don't have any moral dilemmas at all about my sense of fairness and justice! You may, but that's your issue!

Yeah your argument is so Propositional fallacy I'm trying not to laugh. 

Edited by Snake
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

You can't believe either side.  You have to let the facts make the case.  I am not going to believe a woman who is afraid to reveal her name even in confidentiality to the man you are accusing.

@Snake Let me ask you this.  If a woman came in here and said you sexually assaulted her.  Are we supposed to ban you until you are proven innocent or are we supposed to get the facts and make a decision after all the facts are in.

We can't as a society just assume that because a woman or women come out and make a claim against a person.  The case must unfold and both sides need to investigate a prove their case.

I don't know whether he did it or not.  What I find extremely unfair is that so many women came out in 2+ weeks and not a one of them has given their name.  To me they are hiding something.  

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      something to feel good about in the offseason..."could be something special brewing in Carolina"

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • frankw
      something to feel good about in the offseason..."could be something special brewing in Carolina"

      By frankw · Posted

      In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...