Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucky Brooks won't be sucked into Mac's meteoric rise


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Agent Blue said:

Someone needs to remind ol bucky that the most important traits for a QB are IQ and accuracy. 

Of which you could say Mac is tops in the draft. 

I don't know about that. Most QBs are accurate from clean pockets. Moreover, it hasn't been established that Mac has the highest football IQ of these guys, much less IQ in general. I know for sure that Lance read defenses and called his own plays. Fields ran somewhat advanced RPO concepts, and the golden boy was, well, the golden boy. So, hold your horses! 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

I don't know about that. Most QBs are accurate from clean pockets. Moreover, it hasn't been established that Mac has the highest football IQ of these guys, much less IQ in general. I know for sure that Lance read defenses and called his own plays. Fields ran somewhat advanced RPO concepts, and the golden boy was, well, the golden boy. So, hold your horses! 

Bruh, Cam could be standing alone in nothing but undies and throw a ball over a dudes head lol 

Lance's coaches barely asked him to do anything. They only called passing plays for him a few times a game. 

Lance either took off and ran or throw the ball deep. Was not alot of mid range throws. 

Fields on the other hand, someone could make a case for. Not Lance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Agent Blue said:

Bruh, Cam could be standing alone in nothing but undies and throw a ball over a dudes head lol 

Lance's coaches barely asked him to do anything. They only called passing plays for him a few times a game. 

Lance either took off and ran or throw the ball deep. Was not alot of mid range throws. 

Fields on the other hand, someone could make a case for. Not Lance.

 

Lance has the strongest arm in this class, ran a pro-style offense, and indeed ran read defenses and called his own plays. So what if he ran a lot. He also had 190+ completions and threw for nearly 2800 yards on the way to a FCS championship at a very good D-1 school. He obviously did what it took to win, and did it successfully. Confusing didn't throw with can't throw isn't the way to evaluate a prospective franchise QB. Come on, man.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Lance has the strongest arm in this class, ran a pro-style offense, and indeed ran read defenses and called his own plays. So what if he ran a lot. He also had 190+ completions and threw for nearly 2800 yards on the way to a FCS championship at a very good D-1 school. He obviously did what it took to win, and did it successfully. Confusing didn't throw with can't throw isn't the way to evaluate a prospective franchise QB. Come on, man.

Where in my post did I say "can't throw"? 

Learn to read. 

Stats are there for all to see. 

He barely threw the ball much each game. 

Most of his plays were runs or throws deep. 

His competition was not good and he was on a stacked team for said division. 

He is risky AF to draft. 

Basically looks like a poor man's Cam Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Agent Blue said:

Where in my post did I say "can't throw"? 

Learn to read. 

Stats are there for all to see. 

He barely threw the ball much each game. 

Most of his plays were runs or throws deep. 

His competition was not good and he was on a stacked team for said division. 

He is risky AF to draft. 

Basically looks like a poor man's Cam Newton.

If you're saying he barely threw each game--which he averaged 174 YPG, which isn't necessarily a lot, but he threw 17 times per game on average--why do you keep saying it? What are you insinuating? And don't give some illogical answer! 

I can not only read, but read between the lines...

As far as your analysis, you have a right to your opinion--which is replete with the standard, if not simplistic, generalities--but I'd rather trust the guys that do this for a living. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

If you're saying he barely threw each game--which he averaged 174 YPG, which isn't necessarily a lot, but he threw 17 times per game on average--why do you keep saying it? What are you insinuating? And don't give some illogical answer! 

I can not only read, but read between the lines...

As far as your analysis, you have a right to your opinion--which is replete with the standard, if not simplistic, generalities--but I'd rather trust the guys that do this for a living. 

I am stating facts. 

His coaches didn't rely on him slanging the ball around the field. 174 ypg is pretty paltry for a QB that is slated to go very high in the draft. 

Most his plays were runs and deep balls. Not much mid range stuff. 

Combine that with the competition and it will have many people raising eyebrows. 

This dude is a big boom or bust player. Many question marks. 

He could turn out to be awesome or find himself on the bench within 2 years. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Agent Blue said:

I am stating facts. 

His coaches didn't rely on him slanging the ball around the field. 174 ypg is pretty paltry for a QB that is slated to go very high in the draft. 

Most his plays were runs and deep balls. Not much mid range stuff. 

Combine that with the competition and it will have many people raising eyebrows. 

This dude is a big boom or bust player. Many question marks. 

He could turn out to be awesome or find himself on the bench within 2 years. 

 

 

His coaches relied on him to win, and that's exactly what he did!

He threw all kinds of passes, even mid-range ones. He can make every throw, and he's an able runner.

Level of competition is lower, but that goes both ways. 

Ask his coach if he's boom-or-bust? Without the proper coaching, they're all boom-or-bust prospects. Boom or bust is a generalized term that really means very little. And like any QB, Lance could turn out to be a flop or a legit NFL starter.

Most evaluators try to isolate the traits and project whether or not a guy has what it takes to succeed in the NFL. Depending upon those traits, they then assign a grade to the prospect. For most analysts of note--not all--Lance gets a first round grade! That's just what it is! 

If we get Let, I'll feel good about it. If we draft Fields, I'll feel good about it. But I'm under no illusions that either one is just going to hit the ground running. They're going to have to develop. And, like it or not--admit it or not--no one knows who will be the better QB after all is said and done (and that includes Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, and even Mac Jones, etc.). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

His coaches relied on him to win, and that's exactly what he did!

He threw all kinds of passes, even mid-range ones. He can make every throw, and he's an able runner.

Level of competition is lower, but that goes both ways. 

Ask his coach if he's boom-or-bust? Without the proper coaching, they're all boom-or-bust prospects. Boom or bust is a generalized term that really means very little. And like any QB, Lance could turn out to be a flop or a legit NFL starter.

Most evaluators try to isolate the traits and project whether or not a guy has what it takes to succeed in the NFL. Depending upon those traits, they then assign a grade to the prospect. For most analysts of note--not all--Lance gets a first round grade! That's just what it is! 

If we get Let, I'll feel good about it. If we draft Fields, I'll feel good about it. But I'm under no illusions that either one is just going to hit the ground running. They're going to have to develop. And, like it or not--admit it or not--no one knows who will be the better QB after all is said and done (and that includes Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, and even Mac Jones, etc.). 

 

No QB is a sure thing. Good a chance as any that TW flops. 

It's just some players I feel more comfortable with than others. 

I feel much better about fields than lance. 

Justin Fields being judged unfairly leading up to 2021 NFL Draft (withthefirstpick.com)

Fields threw the least amount of RPOs and was the most accurate passer in the draft. (ball placement not simply compl %)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/b8cb7513-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/bcc6351f-df10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/215f1c32-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/2aaa4f45-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/85678457-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/8c5d066f-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/5539b830-e610-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/31f3682d-e710-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/11879601-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/52b987cf-f410-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/f835b92e-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/607903a0-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864   https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/13340fd4-e910-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/eedf98e8-ea10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/b1cd1a2c-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/dc7add4b-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/1173afac-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/9b3ce3ba-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/bb15b0f3-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/34a73dfb-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e04553c9-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e47ca0d2-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/03535913-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/6084ce4e-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864   https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/07346d42-df10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/3f8a8ade-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/53c6c8b4-e110-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/062e9c45-e310-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e2b6d707-e510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/d263566a-e610-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/d0b9b26b-e710-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/8826a310-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/a879baac-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/ee5135e0-ef10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864
    • Fitspresso has taken the weight loss world by storm, claiming to be a revolutionary "coffee hack" that melts fat away effortlessly. But before you dive into a purchase, understanding the hype and the facts behind Fitspresso is crucial. This review will delve into Fitspresso's claims, ingredients, potential benefits and drawbacks, user experiences, and ultimately, help you decide if it's the right fit for your weight loss journey. Burning Promises: What Does Fitspresso Claim to Do? Fitspresso positions itself as a natural weight loss supplement that utilizes the power of a unique blend of ingredients to supercharge your metabolism and burn fat faster. Their claims are bold: Effortless fat burning: Fitspresso promises to keep your "fat burning window" open for longer, leading to accelerated fat loss without drastic lifestyle changes. Increased energy levels: The supplement boasts a boost in energy levels, allowing you to tackle your day with more vigor. Craving control: Fitspresso claims to curb sugar cravings and keep you feeling fuller for longer, reducing unhealthy snacking habits. Overall well-being: Improved digestion, stress reduction, and a general sense of well-being are all touted benefits of incorporating Fitspresso into your routine. Unveiling the Ingredients: What's Inside Fitspresso? Fitspresso prides itself on its all-natural formula. While the exact ingredient list might be proprietary, reviews and the manufacturer's information point to some key components: Green Tea Extract: A well-known metabolism booster, green tea extract is packed with antioxidants and may help increase calorie burning. Probiotics: These gut-friendly bacteria can contribute to digestive health, which can indirectly impact weight management. Guarana Seed: A natural source of caffeine, guarana can provide an energy boost but may also cause jitters in some users. Scientific Scrutiny: Does the Science Back Up Fitspresso's Claims? While some of the ingredients in Fitspresso have shown promise in weight management research, the evidence for Fitspresso itself is limited. Here's a closer look: Metabolism Boost: Green tea extract does have some thermogenic properties, meaning it can increase body heat production and slightly elevate metabolism. However, the effect is likely to be modest. Fat Burning: There's no magic bullet for effortless fat burning. Significant weight loss requires a combination of healthy eating, regular exercise, and a sustainable calorie deficit. Craving Control: While some ingredients may influence satiety hormones, their effectiveness in completely eliminating cravings can be variable. User Experiences: What Do People Say About Fitspresso? Fitspresso reviews paint a mixed picture. Many users report positive experiences, feeling more energized, noticing a slight improvement in weight management, and appreciating the convenience of the supplement. However, critical reviews also exist. Some users mention minimal results, while others highlight side effects like jitters or digestive discomfort potentially linked to the caffeine content. It's important to remember that individual experiences can vary significantly. The Money-Back Guarantee: A Safety Net or a Marketing Tactic? Fitspresso offers a 180-day money-back guarantee, which can be appealing. However, be sure to understand the fine print. Many money-back guarantees have specific requirements for returns, and shipping costs might not be refundable. Considering the Alternatives: What Else is Out There? Before committing to Fitspresso, explore other avenues for sustainable weight loss. Here are some alternatives: Diet and Exercise: The cornerstone of healthy weight management is a balanced diet combined with regular physical activity. Behavioral Changes: Small, sustainable changes in your daily routine, like portion control or mindful eating, can lead to significant results over time. Consulting a Doctor or Nutritionist: A healthcare professional can create a personalized plan that addresses your specific needs and goals. The Verdict: Is Fitspresso the Right Choice for You? The decision ultimately depends on your individual needs and expectations. Here's a breakdown to help you decide: Pros: All-natural formula (assuming full ingredient list transparency) Potential for a slight metabolism boost and energy increase (for some) Convenience of a supplement Money-back guarantee (read the fine print) Cons: Lack of strong scientific evidence for significant weight loss Potential side effects May not be a sustainable solution for long-term weight management Cost, which could be better invested in healthy food options   https://jobs.firerescue1.com/job/2rcp3c/in-depth-fitspresso-reviews-honest-customer-experiences-and-feedback-fits-39/fitspresso-reviews/florida
    • It's GAMEDAY AGAIN win this one boys it's one game! 
×
×
  • Create New...