Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Place your bets


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Basbear said:

Forum discussion...welll for adults...... reaches a point where both sides strongly belief what they belief. So you could start the name calling, bring up something thats not related to the topic, or put your money where your statement are. Money is out cause some people will not pay up, thus being a welsher. Ive had a few not pay up, so you have to find another method. 

I got two bets going with two different posters. Lance within 10 spots of fields and 5 or less DTs drafted before the start of round 4. In both cases months ago I felt strong about these, couple huddler thought different. Draft week is almost here and Im ready. 

What happens if you lose both? Do you have to ping-pong between 2 avatars? How does that work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mccjeff said:

What happens if you lose both? Do you have to ping-pong between 2 avatars? How does that work?

I put in a fail safe in the agreed terms= 6 is a push. 7 and above 45fan wins, 5 and below me. 

There will be a winner......unless a team drafts half a person.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I put in a fail safe in the agreed terms= 6 is a push. 7 and above 45fan wins, 5 and below me. 

There will be a winner......unless a team drafts half a person.....

You misunderstand. What if Fields goes 4 and Lance goes 20 so Varking wins and 8 DTs are taken in the first 3 rounds so 45 wins. Then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mccjeff said:

You misunderstand. What if Fields goes 4 and Lance goes 20 so Varking wins and 8 DTs are taken in the first 3 rounds so 45 wins. Then what?

Aye I got you, the Lance bet with Varking is for signature rights. 45 bet with DTs is for avatar rights. I mean ,what....., I lose two bets and have have to change BOTH my avatar and signature?!?!?!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Aye I got you, the Lance bet with Varking is for signature rights. 45 bet with DTs is for avatar rights. I mean ,what....., I lose two bets and have have to change BOTH my avatar and signature?!?!?!

 

Ahhhh.... Got it. I thought they were both avatar bets. I was just curious how that was going to play out. And I doubt you lose the Varking bet.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...