Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurricanes @ Predators 5/8-5/10 Regular Season Final Two


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Throughout professional sports you see teams give less effort when the games don't mean much, I'm simply observing that doing so is human nature.... The risk/reward of losing key players to more physical play isn't great.

We are 0-1 in the playoffs. Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zacka77ack said:

Yea. We have 9 games against the Preds now. And we've lost the series opener.

Two Caveats. No Slavin, both goals were on his spot in the line and Necas rung the post if that is an a few CM closer in that game was 1-1 easy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anybodyhome said:

Vegas has 2-0 on the Blues in the 1st. I'm not surprised if Canes lose the President's Cup before it's over.

They gotta go against Colorado though. Colorado is still fighting for their division one seed. That’s our only boon even if we win Monday. But in a 3 way tie with 82 points Colorado wins. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Not the cup I care about personally.

Long picture dude, the cup means nothing. In a potential travel situation so you really want to potentially have to play 4 games in Colorado or Vegas? You think Dallas travel is too much... 

If we win out it’s a high probability we see one of them in the finale. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Long picture dude, the cup means nothing. In a potential travel situation so you really want to potentially have to play 4 games in Colorado or Vegas? You think Dallas travel is too much... 

If we win out it’s a high probability we see one of them in the finale. 

Realistically? I don't think Dallas was too much I was speaking of conserving energy for the long haul, If we pick up a point only Vegas will have Home ice.... luckily only one of them will make round 3.... no guarentee they make the finals, we are locked in on home ice for the first three rounds. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...