Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Round One, Game 2


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Im at the game I the crowd didn't like that one I didn't get a good look at it but that was a ticky tacky call here. "Refs you suck" is the chant of the night.

Haula had a good full second before he embellished. I would not be surprised if there’s a fine incoming for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Canes have allowed the clearly inferior team get into their heads.

I think it’s more so the press have dialed back their physicality down to a one. Our guys are hitting like it’s a playoff match. We just gotta get these ticky tack interference calls under control. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCandyMan said:

They booing to muck with him, or did he do/say something?

They are booing him cause he was a cane and there was bad blood on the trade from him from my understanding. Someone could probably elaborate better. Then he’s basically been a poo the past two games so now it’s just sticking and getting worse. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

They are booing him cause he was a cane and there was bad blood on the trade from him from my understanding. Someone could probably elaborate better. Then he’s basically been a poo the past two games so now it’s just sticking and getting worse. 

I missed the saltiness after the trade, but he’s definitely been a douche canoe the last 2 games. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...