Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Off-Season "To-Do's"


 Share

Recommended Posts

Carolina Panthers

  • Get Sam Darnold Comfortable in the Offense
  • Bring Christian McCaffrey Along Slowly
  • Pick a No. 3 Wide Receiver

To be fair, the Carolina Panthers have questions to answer on defense. Who plays where at linebacker (and which linebackers stay on the field on passing downs) is a matter that may not be decided until well into the summer.

But the biggest "to-dos" in Charlotte in 2021 are on offense—largely because the team has a new quarterback in Sam Darnold.

As David Newton reported for ESPN, Panthers coach Matt Rhule noted how important it is that Carolina's young skill-position players get as much work in as possible with the team's 23-year-old signal-caller.

"We have a young team," Rhule said. "It's a chance for us to develop some just very basic skills for a lot of guys, basic knowledge of our system, then try to grow from there."

However, there's one player we probably won't see much of—at least where contact is concerned. There's been nothing to indicate that star running back Christian McCaffrey won't be 100 percent for the season opener after an injury-marred 2020. Still, it's a safe bet that his participation in padded practices will mostly be done in a non-contact jersey.

With Curtis Samuel now catching passes in the nation's capital, the Panthers also need to decide who will serve as the team's third receiver. Free-agent acquisition David Moore is the front-runner in the early going, but if rookie Terrace Marshall Jr. proves to be a quick study, it won't be long before the LSU speedster is on the field.

Link: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2943731-every-nfl-teams-to-do-list-for-rest-of-the-2021-offseason

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the biggest changes we need to make are on defense. I know folks give Snow a pass because we had so many rookies and young guys playing but honestly without guys like Brown and Chinn we would have been even worse. Our scheme between the 20s was awful. Our 3 man rush was so predictable and easy to block coupled with a passive zone defense where we didn't even attack receivers when they wandered into our zone looked like a high school team.  

Then we would go to more of a pressure look and blitz more frequently inside of the 20 and we got better results although still not good. 

We only keep other teams to less than 20 points on 4 occasions and won all 4 games. We gave up more than 30 points 6 times and lost them all.  Our offense controlled the ball fairly well or the defense would have looked much worse. We were 28th in red zone offensive scoring scoring TDs 50% of the time and allowed opposing teams to score TDs 65% of the time on defense for a ranking of 22nd.   Without a much improved defense it won't matter what the offense is doing. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

To me the biggest changes we need to make are on defense. I know folks give Snow a pass because we had so many rookies and young guys playing but honestly without guys like Brown and Chinn we would have been even worse. Our scheme between the 20s was awful. Our 3 man rush was so predictable and easy to block coupled with a passive zone defense where we didn't even attack receivers when they wandered into our zone looked like a high school team.  

Then we would go to more of a pressure look and blitz more frequently inside of the 20 and we got better results although still not good. 

We only keep other teams to less than 20 points on 4 occasions and won all 4 games. We gave up more than 30 points 6 times and lost them all.  Our offense controlled the ball fairly well or the defense would have looked much worse. We were 28th in red zone offensive scoring scoring TDs 50% of the time and allowed opposing teams to score TDs 65% of the time on defense for a ranking of 22nd.   Without a much improved defense it won't matter what the offense is doing. 

I agree.  I think perryman, reddick, horn are going to make a huge difference here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...