Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen’s grade per the Panthers


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

For those of us that are draft nuts, we were the ones pitching a fit when we moved up for Little.  It was the casual fans here that couldn't understand what all the commotion was about, especially when they would Google Little and saw what his potential was SUPPOSED to be.  Key word being "supposed" because he basically plateaued in college after early success and then absolutely tanked in the pre-draft activities.  Needless to say, those of us that keep up with such things saw the red flags waiving vigorously and why we were not shocked to see Little's drop in the draft and likewise why we were absolutely baffled that Marty moved up to get him.

No offense to the "draft nuts", but y'all don't all agree....and some projected busts succeed and vice versa.

I believe there is a huge difference between:  we did nothing to address a glaring need and we did something different than what the fans/draft nuts wanted.

People worrying about safety here, have a legit gripe, because we've essentially done nothing.

People worried about the oline should wait and see if Christiansen, Brown, and Moore  pan out.  

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Non fan sites had Little graded at 2 and sometimes 1.

Who do you respect?

NFL.Com :WILL BE STARTER WITHIN FIRST TWO SEASONS

CBS: ;CBS Sports has Little as the No. 16 overall prospect and the No. 2 offensive lineman

PFN:Greg Little is a top offensive lineman in this draft and will be a top first round pick.

SI: First round

Walter Football:Player Comparison: Russell Okung

Many players were polarizing drafts, even Cam and Luke.

It wasn't just fans, and wasn't just the panthers high on Little.

That is the media versus the scouts/league. That kind of thing happens every draft. Even a lot of media sources stated he is a boom or bust prospect and a lot of teams had him graded as a late round/Day 3 prospect. 

We were one of the teams fooled by that potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

No offense to the "draft nuts", but y'all don't all agree....and some projected busts succeed and vice versa.

I believe there is a huge difference between:  we did nothing to address a glaring need and we did something different than what the fans/draft nuts wanted.

People worrying about safety here, have a legit gripe, because we've essentially done nothing.

People worried about the oline should wait and see if Christiansen, Brown, and Moore  pan out.  

 

Everyone has opinions on players and they will differ widely. That is no different than what happens in the NFL amongst the professionals. 

It is difficult to justify that trade up when draftniks, media types and league sources all had a laundry list of cons to go with his pros. To me, that isn't a guy you trade up for. Especially with some of the work ethic concerns that he had and the poor showings at the workouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

 caused the entire League to pump the breaks on him...except Marty Hurney.

The entire league?

All we know is he wasn't chosen in the first round.  Most projections were 2nd round.  We took him top of the second, we don't know who would have taken him where.

When people complain about draft picks, they act like they know how a prospect will turn out...or what the "entire league" is thinking.    Someone might have drafted him before or after us...we don't know.

I showed you predraft profiles from legitimate sites.

Where are your profiles that say "DO NOT DRAFT GREG LITTLE!"

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It is difficult to justify that trade up when draftniks, media types and league sources all had a laundry list of cons to go with his pros. To me, that isn't a guy you trade up for. 

Very very few draft profiles fail to list a bunch of cons for even first round draft picks.  I remember reading about Cam's personal/offield concerns and his decision making.

The draftniks complain when a player is drafted because he wasn't their player and if he busts, he goes "see I told you so."  When they're wrong, well, there are very few crow posts here.   Meanwhile the draftniks fav busted as well...

Draft grade/draft rank/draft position/ draftnik opinion, and fan opinion don't have that much predictive value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

The entire league?

All we know is he wasn't chosen in the first round.  Most projections were 2nd round.  We took him top of the second, we don't know who would have taken him where.

When people complain about draft picks, they act like they know how a prospect will turn out...or what the "entire league" is thinking.    Someone might have drafted him before or after us...we don't know.

I showed you predraft profiles from legitimate sites.

Where are your profiles that say "DO NOT DRAFT GREG LITTLE!"

  

The onus is on you brother, not me.  I'm 100% on my recollection of Little in that draft.  Feel free to dig through my posts if you want. I'm not a draft expert, but I get a good amount of stuff right.  I admittedly get some wrong too.  Luke probably being the biggest one, not because any questions of ability, but because we had bigger needs than MLB in that draft, especially with already Beason here.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Very very few draft profiles fail to list a bunch of cons for even first round draft picks.  I remember reading about Cam's personal/offield concerns and his decision making.

The draftniks complain when a player is drafted because he wasn't their player and if he busts, he goes "see I told you so."  When they're wrong, well, there are very few crow posts here.   Meanwhile the draftniks fav busted as well...

Draft grade/draft rank/draft position/ draftnik opinion, and fan opinion don't have that much predictive value.

Yeah, I don't think you saw the same kind of cons for Little. He was widely viewed as a project player and a college underachiever. When you pile on his abysmal showing in the workouts and his spotty film, he had the kind of red flags that you would normally associate with a 4th round or later prospect. Hence why some teams had him as a late round prospect. 

Hurney, in typical fashion, got blinded by what could be and lost sight of what actually was. Fairly standard move for him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

The entire league?

All we know is he wasn't chosen in the first round.  Most projections were 2nd round.  We took him top of the second, we don't know who would have taken him where.

When people complain about draft picks, they act like they know how a prospect will turn out...or what the "entire league" is thinking.    Someone might have drafted him before or after us...we don't know.

I showed you predraft profiles from legitimate sites.

Where are your profiles that say "DO NOT DRAFT GREG LITTLE!"

  

Why did he "fall" from the first round then?  While I wouldn't have been thrilled with him at our original slotted pick in the second round, the questionable part was moving up to get him.  That's what made a questionable pick even worse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Why did he "fall" from the first round then?  While I wouldn't have been thrilled with him at our original slotted pick in the second round, the questionable part was moving up to get him.  That's what made a questionable pick even worse.

Yeah, and had we selected him in the 3rd round or later without any trade up(and he likely would have been available) then I wouldn't even have an issue with him being a bust now. 

After the third round, I fully expect most players will not be successful. That is literally the history of those picks.

Any time you nail a 4th round or lower guy, that is a huge victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

11 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The onus is on you brother, not me.  I'm 100% on my recollection of Little in that draft. 

Uh-huh

Thats fine, I looked, you're going to have a very hard time finding reputable sources beyond messageboards warning people off Little. I couldn't find any...soooo.

BTW, Keuchley, that's a pretty big miss.

 

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Why did he "fall" from the first round then? 

I seriously couldn't find the "entire league" posts on why everyone knew Little sucked.  I'm done looking, right now I think it only exists on messageboards.  

 

Quote

While I wouldn't have been thrilled with him at our original slotted pick in the second round, the questionable part was moving up to get him.  That's what made a questionable pick even worse.

I wouldn't mind so much if he panned out. He hasn't yet.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

 

Uh-huh

Thats fine, I looked, you're going to have a very hard time finding reputable sources beyond messageboards warning people off Little. I couldn't find any...soooo.

BTW, Keuchley, that's a pretty big miss.

 

I seriously couldn't find the "entire league" posts on why everyone knew Little sucked.  I'm done looking, right now I think it only exists on messageboards.  

 

I wouldn't mind so much if he panned out. He hasn't yet.

It doesn't take that much Googling to find the critical comments about him. Walterfootball had them, PFN had them, NFL.com had them. Those are just the ones off the top of my head. 

If anyone is still waiting for him to pan out.....I wouldn't hold my breath. If you think our opinion of him is low, I can't imagine how you would likely react to the actual coaching staff opinion of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

It doesn't take that much Googling to find the critical comments about him. Walterfootball had them, PFN had them, NFL.com had them. Those are just the ones off the top of my head. 

If anyone is still waiting for him to pan out.....I wouldn't hold my breath. If you think our opinion of him is low, I can't imagine how you would likely react to the actual coaching staff opinion of him.

Dude those exact sites say the exact opposite.  I used them to support my position:

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Dude those exact sites say the exact opposite.  I used them to support my position:

 

 

 

lol reading is fundamental. Now prepare for the rebuttal explaining how you are still wrong.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Greg Little, Mississippi: Looked like a pure RT running the 40 where he posted very pedestrian time of 5.33 with a slow 10-yard split of 1.84. Didn’t show much explosion in the vertical, but his short shuttle was okay.

OL 2019 Combne notes

Another disappointing assesment

Losers

These guys struggled on Friday, while also happening to all have significant concerns on their tape as well.

Greg Little, OT, Ole Miss

Owner of the second-worst 40 and the third-worst vertical jump, Little didn't impress in most of the drills he did do at the Combine, but it may have been the on-field workout where he looked the most concerning. He moves well on tape, but his movements are unorthodox and his footwork can look different on a rep-to-rep basis. I like Little as a developmental prospect that needs significant technical improvements, however understanding what he is right now as a player will be important for teams.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...