Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

World War II in HD

TheSaint

By TheSaint,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

TheSaint Newbie

TheSaint

Posted
  • Author
Posted

DVR'd it and watching the first one now... pretty good. Would like my kids to watch it too, but it's a little graphic for them now.

Yep..me too. 1st episode.

Couldnt have been a better Monday Night game to skip.:D

Ill check in on it occasionally. But i suspect WWII will be more interesting despite already knowing the outcome Scrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Epistaxis Newbie

Epistaxis

Posted
Posted

In "HD" is horsepoo.

More accurate to say "in color", which was already done a few years back.

They added some A-list and B-list actor voice-overs, and interviewed a few of the actual vets.

It is ok, but call me old fashioned....I like the grainy black and white stuff.

And believe it or not, we had Allies in that slog, one of which was pretty much alone for quite some time. This is limited in scope, by design, and the footage is not all new.

Give me "The World at War". Still the gold standard when it comes to WWII documentaries. I watched this, because the Cleveland Browns are far from compelling television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...