Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2020 and 2021 Draft Picks to the PS


 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Newbie said:

That looks good but Taylor is making the team and wouldn't clear waivers anyways. 

I admit that I don't know much about Taylor, but I did mean to include him on my poachable list. He was a fringe guy for me, but I ended up giving his roster spot to Chandler. Mainly because of how much Rhule talked up Chandler's ST play recently. I haven't heard Taylor mentioned in camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shaqattaq said:

I admit that I don't know much about Taylor, but I did mean to include him on my poachable list. He was a fringe guy for me, but I ended up giving his roster spot to Chandler. Mainly because of how much Rhule talked up Chandler's ST play recently. I haven't heard Taylor mentioned in camp.

Taylor is a tall press corner who fits Phil Snow’s defense well. I think I saw him listed higher than STO and Pride Jr. already on the depth chart already. I haven’t heard much about most of our rookies in training camp but the Athletic had a positive blurb on Jackson’s training camp. I get your point on Chandler but if anything Taylor will make it over Hoskins. We can sign Hoskins to the practice squad but I’d be shocked if someone like Seattle didn’t grab Taylor. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Newbie said:

Taylor is a tall press corner who fits Phil Snow’s defense well. I think I saw him listed higher than STO and Pride Jr. already on the depth chart already. I haven’t heard much about most of our rookies in training camp but the Athletic had a positive blurb on Jackson’s training camp. I get your point on Chandler but if anything Taylor will make it over Hoskins. We can sign Hoskins to the practice squad but I’d be shocked if someone like Seattle didn’t grab Taylor. 

I hear ya. Hoskins was another fringe guy on my list. So many new guys on the bottom of the list, it's hard to get a feel for everyone. I am impressed with how much we keep churning those last 5 guys on the roster. Much more than previous years it seems.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I hear ya. Hoskins was another fringe guy on my list. So many new guys on the bottom of the list, it's hard to get a feel for everyone. I am impressed with how much we keep churning those last 5 guys on the roster. Much more than previous years it seems.

Our opponents target our weakest players on rotation.  I was watching the highlights of the Saints game the other day, and they kept killing us in the run....each time the huge hole was because one of our DEPTH lineman.  

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
    • I was just a teenager when I joined in 2013. I've loved the many opinions on this forum, even though several are infuriating. I've had several bad takes, myself,  that I've hopefully grown out of over the years.
×
×
  • Create New...