Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st Round Redo: Horn vs Slater


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think we have to worry about that with this staff. They don't have any issue playing young players. Could be another Whitehead situation, the young guys just aren't quite there yet. 

We will see, but it’s obvious the guys they put out with the first string aren’t the best players at their positions. Christiansen, Daley, and maybe Deonte Brown will be starting this season. Maybe not Week 1 but it needs to happen.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hepcat said:

What game were you watching? That was the Steelers backups and they got pressure every single play. You want to imagine what their defense would have looked like if TJ Watt and Bud Dupree played? LOL 

I was watching a preseason game against a top defense bringing pressure against a starting offense playing their first extended action.  They got pressure because they  blitzed most plays bringing 5 or 6.  Overall I thought we did better than I expected honestly.  Surely not enough for all the hysteria.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I was watching a preseason game against a top defense bringing pressure against a starting offense playing their first extended action.  They got pressure because they  blitzed most plays bringing 5 or 6.  Overall I thought we did better than I expected honestly.  Surely not enough for all the hysteria.

That was better than you expected?? Damn, I didn't think anyone had a lower opinion of that OL than me.

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I was watching a preseason game against a top defense bringing pressure against a starting offense playing their first extended action.  They got pressure because they  blitzed most plays bringing 5 or 6.  Overall I thought we did better than I expected honestly.  Surely not enough for all the hysteria.

The second string of a top defense is not a top defense. 

And against a second string defense, the Panthers first string offensive line directly cost the Panthers two scoring opportunities. Run blocking and pass blocking were both downright atrocious at times.

And if the Steelers first string was in, the way that line was playing….I don’t even want to speculate.

But the good news is, the Steelers second string defense is probably better than the Jets first string defense so hopefully Week 1 we see a better performance.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That was better than you expected?? Damn, I didn't think anyone had a lower opinion of that OL than me.

Not at all. Go back and watching any of  the last several years when we played Pittsburgh in the preseason or regular season. Our line would look like a sieve and the Steelers would have a party in our back field. And how many times have we made rookies and backups look awesome.  I was hoping to avoid a disaster so yeah we looked much better than I expected.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Given the wide receivers in our division it is Horn. Our O line gets criticized every year yet we end up middle of the pack. Whether it is Moton or Erving we will be okay this year.  Would I have liked Slater? Sure but not instead of Horn who if we didn't draft him would be playing in New Orleans against us.

Middle of the pack isn't a good thing.

 

 

As for Horn or Slater, we'll have to wait and see. If both play well, then it's a matter of philosophy. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Not at all. Go back and watching any of  the last several years when we played Pittsburgh in the preseason or regular season. Our line would look like a sieve and the Steelers would have a party in our back field. And how many times have we made rookies and backups look awesome.  I was hoping to avoid a disaster so yeah we looked much better than I expected.

Eh.....that's fair. They really have destroyed us recently. I suppose if that is the bar, this was better than that.

Not much of a bar though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The second string of a top defense is not a top defense. 

And against a second string defense, the Panthers first string offensive line directly cost the Panthers two scoring opportunities. Run blocking and pass blocking were both downright atrocious at times.

And if the Steelers first string was in, the way that line was playing….I don’t even want to speculate.

But the good news is, the Steelers second string defense is probably better than the Jets first string defense so hopefully Week 1 we see a better performance.

The talent might drop.off somewhat but the scheme is the same and that is what we got experience against which is one of the best in the league.  We also mixed up our line as we went and some of those guys starting for our line might end up being backups so no it was  a good test. You just went on a rant trashing the line and won't give any concessions so no need to go on and in with you. As I showed you in another post we always end up.middle of the pack and this year will be the same. But you can chicken little all you want...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I liked about Horn, he locked up Chase Claypool, who played A LOT last season. Like, Haskins didn't even look his way after the first one. taking a way half the field? I'll take that every day. 

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

One thing I liked about Horn, he locked up Chase Claypool, who's player A LOT last season. Like, Haskins didn't even look his way after the first one. taking a way half the field? I'll take that every day. 

To be fair though, Haskins might have not looked his way because he is a horrible QB who should not be in the NFL anymore 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hepcat said:

To be fair though, Haskins might have not looked his way because he is a horrible QB who should not be in the NFL anymore 

Yeah, I don't think you will see that same thing with Big Ben in there. If anything, he is probably going to be keen to challenge the rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Middle of the pack isn't a good thing.

 

 

As for Horn or Slater, we'll have to wait and see. If both play well, then it's a matter of philosophy. 

 

Yeah it is if we start off being ranked in the very bottom.  Our secondary needed fixing more than the line this year. Moton is going to left tackle and we will be much improved. You are not one to chicken little so your take it a little surprising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Eh.....that's fair. They really have destroyed us recently. I suppose if that is the bar, this was better than that.

Not much of a bar though.

Exactly. When your line is ranked 30 out of 32  and you are facing a top defense who has routinely trashed you and broke the best quarterback you have ever had, the bar is pretty low.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Yeah it is if we start off being ranked in the very bottom.  Our secondary needed fixing more than the line this year. Moton is going to left tackle and we will be much improved. You are not one to chicken little so your take it a little surprising.

I really don't see it as being a Chicken Little as much as I see it as being realistic. I guess it's a matter of expectations. 

In any event, I don't know how anyone can feel good about Paradis, Elfein and Miller last night. And that was basically against backups. "It was preseason" is about the best sugarcoating you can put on it.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...