Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting RG on covid list


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Contact Buncombe County and ask them about the discrepancy.

What point are you trying to make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but did notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Real facts got dropped on you by @mav1234

You're wrong and by your own logic you're arguing that you should be permabanned.

Someone got exposed alright...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Not to mention those are doses administered by BCHHS specifically it seemsI...  don't know the counties vaccine distribution effort but it probably doesn't include stats when people get one or both doses elsewhere. Not to mention we don't know the percentage of those doses that were J&J...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

Not only that but he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Better to have kept your mouth shut and been assumed a moron than to have opened it and removed all doubt. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Floppin said:

Not only that buy he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Good point. Another reason we shouldn't extrapolate doses administered to % or rate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Hahaha dude you took a small time slice of vaccination effort for one entity doing vaccinations out of many, did shitty napkin math that was wrong on multiple levels, and embarassed yourself. Do keep up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

You still haven't figured out that the "doses administered" figure that you're using is only for a 2.5 week period and not a "total doses administered"?

My god dude, just stop before you embarrass yourself more.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Also, BCHHS is a department so this may not even include CVS, Walgreens, etc. According to the NC dashboard, the total number of first doses in the county is 166k and if you include second doses, the total number of doses for the county is probably almost triple the number. Man, some people are just morons.

0C092FC0-FC86-4297-A768-0327CCE64CBA.png

Yup, and as @Floppin Pointed out we can't use census numbers since rates are usually reported as elligible adults.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...