Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting RG on covid list


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Contact Buncombe County and ask them about the discrepancy.

What point are you trying to make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but did notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Real facts got dropped on you by @mav1234

You're wrong and by your own logic you're arguing that you should be permabanned.

Someone got exposed alright...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Not to mention those are doses administered by BCHHS specifically it seemsI...  don't know the counties vaccine distribution effort but it probably doesn't include stats when people get one or both doses elsewhere. Not to mention we don't know the percentage of those doses that were J&J...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

Not only that but he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Better to have kept your mouth shut and been assumed a moron than to have opened it and removed all doubt. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Floppin said:

Not only that buy he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Good point. Another reason we shouldn't extrapolate doses administered to % or rate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Hahaha dude you took a small time slice of vaccination effort for one entity doing vaccinations out of many, did shitty napkin math that was wrong on multiple levels, and embarassed yourself. Do keep up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

You still haven't figured out that the "doses administered" figure that you're using is only for a 2.5 week period and not a "total doses administered"?

My god dude, just stop before you embarrass yourself more.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Also, BCHHS is a department so this may not even include CVS, Walgreens, etc. According to the NC dashboard, the total number of first doses in the county is 166k and if you include second doses, the total number of doses for the county is probably almost triple the number. Man, some people are just morons.

0C092FC0-FC86-4297-A768-0327CCE64CBA.png

Yup, and as @Floppin Pointed out we can't use census numbers since rates are usually reported as elligible adults.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve haven’t seen anything that says we have interest in Njoku?
    • I think the Njoku interest revealed intent and the type of TE they want.  I really expected more from Sanders.
    • Defensive tackle (or end in a 3-4 base) is suddenly a rather significant need.  It seems to be a forbidden topic on the Huddle.  Well I am going to unforbidden it for this thread. When we lost Robinson, it was a salary cap cutting move, saving us about $9m or so, I think.  That suggests that we are going to get cheaper, younger, and maybe, more multi-dimensional.  First, what did we lose in Robinson: (Charlotte Observer)  "Robinson co-led the team in sacks (5.5) in 2024, and he ranked second among Carolina linemen, behind Brown, in sacks (2.5) in 2025. (Derrick) Brown played on 76.4% of the Panthers’ defensive snaps last year, while Robinson played on 62.2% of those reps. No other defensive lineman played more than 38.3%, as free-agent addition, Turk Wharton, dealt with injuries throughout his first season in Carolina. Wharton played in just nine games, producing 36 total tackles and two sacks. He’s guaranteed $14 million this upcoming season. Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article314544998.html#storylink=cpy OK, about Turk Wharton.  The Observer claims that he and Bobby Brown III were to rotate into the Robinson DE position, but that is too weird for my head to comprehend.  First, Brown III is a NT by trade and Wharton weighs about 280 lbs and is not stout vs. the run.  Brown III is not going to provide the internal pass pressure; he is basically designed to take on double teams and dig in.  Wharton, on the other hand, had a PFF score in those 9 games of 40 or so.  In fairness, he was playing with injuries, but Damn.  PFF gives me a higher rating at the Golden Corral buffet.  In other words, we need a true DT who can fill the two thirds of snaps that we just released.  We can't count on Turk and Brown III is not the answer.  Cam Jackson?  Same as Brown.  Have your people do what they do best.  Furthermore, Derrick Brown probably should limit his snaps.  Playing more than 3/4 of the snaps is hard on the body.  A tired player in the trenches is more prone to lower-body injuries. We need a player who can give Derrick Brown some relief and play opposite him as well.  Turk can rotate in but he needs to shoot gaps and give Guards and tackles fits--a change of pace.   I have to think we are going to draft DT much sooner than most Huddlers realize.  My favorite, you didn't ask? Probable second-rounder Gracen Halton (No. 59 overall, according to ESPN's March 2026 update). Once considered a Day 3 sleeper, his 2026 NFL draft stock has exploded into Round 2 or 3 due to elite interior pass-rush metrics.  Projected Round: 2 (Early to Mid) Key Traits: Elite explosive, quickness, 12.2%+ pass-rush win rate, and positional versatility to play inside on passing downs. Combine Highlights: Led defensive tackles in the vertical jump (36.5”) and broad jump, per Sports Illustrated. Draft Stock: Rising fast due to consistent 2025 production (7 tackles for loss) and a "freak show" combine performance, according to Stormin in Norman.  Halton is considered a high-motor playmaker and a potential Day 2 standout, notes   I would not be surprised to see DT on day 2.  
×
×
  • Create New...