Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting RG on covid list


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Contact Buncombe County and ask them about the discrepancy.

What point are you trying to make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but did notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Real facts got dropped on you by @mav1234

You're wrong and by your own logic you're arguing that you should be permabanned.

Someone got exposed alright...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't even bother to click on the link. LOL! That's fuging hilarious.

Not to mention those are doses administered by BCHHS specifically it seemsI...  don't know the counties vaccine distribution effort but it probably doesn't include stats when people get one or both doses elsewhere. Not to mention we don't know the percentage of those doses that were J&J...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

Not only that but he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

I gave facts here. I cited real sources this moderator did not bother to cite before making baseless claims. We were told that was a perma ban offense. I know yall wont. He is one of yall. But exposed today

Better to have kept your mouth shut and been assumed a moron than to have opened it and removed all doubt. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Floppin said:

Not only that buy he used census data on total population, which isn't what ANY of the vaccinated rates are based on. They are based on "eligible recipients". It doesn't take a genius to realize that that number is significantly less than total census population. 

Good point. Another reason we shouldn't extrapolate doses administered to % or rate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

Hahaha dude you took a small time slice of vaccination effort for one entity doing vaccinations out of many, did shitty napkin math that was wrong on multiple levels, and embarassed yourself. Do keep up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

The post we are speaking about is about those vaccinated. That means those Fully vaccinated, not those simply administered to with a first dose. Please, do try to keep up

You still haven't figured out that the "doses administered" figure that you're using is only for a 2.5 week period and not a "total doses administered"?

My god dude, just stop before you embarrass yourself more.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Also, BCHHS is a department so this may not even include CVS, Walgreens, etc. According to the NC dashboard, the total number of first doses in the county is 166k and if you include second doses, the total number of doses for the county is probably almost triple the number. Man, some people are just morons.

0C092FC0-FC86-4297-A768-0327CCE64CBA.png

Yup, and as @Floppin Pointed out we can't use census numbers since rates are usually reported as elligible adults.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Except it takes those QB's a few years to develop because they needed to learn the mental side of the game and have it catch up to their physical attributes. Bryce was supposed to be a QB savant who already had a fully developed mental side of the game and that was going to make up for his lack of physical ability.  And his lack of NFL level QB physical traits has been clear as day to anyone who has watched him the last 3 years, mainly, he just doesn't have an NFL arm, he can't zip the ball into tight spaces or throw on a line down the field like is needed at this level.
    • Don’t recall seeing many of his interviews but what strikes me is that he engages and goes in depth. Even with the cliche answers as referenced by OP come across somewhat thoughtful.  Very likable personality despite being someone who can crush an average person like I can crush a paper cup. I knew Motons mother had a career at MSU but was looking on the google and found that Mushin Muhammad personally knew Motons grandfather.   His late grandfather was a professor at MSU.   Cool guy.  Interesting family and small world.      
    • I think people aren’t patient enough with Young. It can take a few years for a QB to develop. Look at Darnold, Baker and most recently Daniel Jones.   he hasn’t been able to put up big passing numbers either cause of how much we run the ball. You can tell our coaching staff still hasn’t took the training wheels off Bryce and let him go all out. We’ve had some pretty bad receivers as well. We finally got a true number one last year and look how much Bryce improved. Still we didn’t really have any depth behind TMac. Coker was hurt for a lot of the year and XL was our #2. How many big plays or TDs has XL dropped? I think this year can be the year we see Bryce able to hit his stride. If not then we can start looking for another qb but I just ask people to be patient.
×
×
  • Create New...