Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule blames the D when asked about offensive struggles


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, MechaZain said:

He’ll get a shot with a new OC before that happens. Rhule and Snow have worked together for years. Brady is the third wheel and will be the first one cut loose if Tepper demands blood.

That's a good point but TBH I don't see Tepper talking anything about blood when he clearly laid out a 5 year plan and I for one am going to take him on that. If a firing happens it'd be because Rhule made the call within that time frame.

Tepper came from the Steelers and they keep coaches long term. That may have been missed by our fanbase and is something to keep in mind going forward. I doubt we see the coaching carousel here. 
Granted we don't know for sure how he is in that regard but its the little we have to go off of when thinking about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2021 at 9:40 PM, Luciu5 said:

Did the defense allow the Eagles to take the lead?  Did the defense stop the Eagles on their final scoring drive?

Answer "yes" or "no".

 

You won't.

Defense played lights out, but it's fair to say they have blame.  Also if you watched the press conference, he clearly did not want the defensive players thinking it's the offense at fault.  He doesn't want an offense/defense rift in the locker room. 

It's a team.  They all win or they all lose.  The defense did not lose less than the offense. 

That's the message Matt Rhule was conveying.  He went into detail.  You either have to be mentally less capable or purposely spinning to not see how his answers were framed in regards to those questions.

I don't blame the defense literally at all. I don't think Rhule is actually blaming the defense for the loss either.  They let up one really big play and they were on the field all day. This was on the hr offense not putting up points.

Hee gave a response about his philosophy. It was a media response question. I don't care what he says in media presser because it's going to be mostly media responses. 

Youre making an entire argument pounding your chest and yelling from the rooftops making a conspiracy from this, when yes you have a lot of valid things to be upset about the past two weeks but this press conference being one of them is literally clown shoes.

This was question the media asks, Rhule answers it, media takes it out of context after a few tweets spin it weird (follow his Twitter to stay up to date!).

Was Donte out of place on those read options? Probably. Did it cost us the game? Technically but no one is saying the game being an L is solely on that. Literally no one.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rags said:

Well more like they were out there more than they should've been.

This is the Eagle drive times. Overall we had TOP +11

 

If people are trying to say the defense was anywhere near tired or on the field too much I don' think they're saying what they think they're saying. Be in some poo if so

pve.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

This is the Eagle drive times. Overall we had TOP +11

 

If people are trying to say the defense was anywhere near tired or on the field too much I don' think they're saying what they think they're saying. Be in some poo if so

pve.PNG

You're right on this. I guess it felt like more just due to how little we moved the ball, but even then the snap count total was still in our favor.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...