Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's 2005 again

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know yet.

What I do know is any suggestion that we should have hung on to Teddy Bridgewater is just ridiculous.

Interestingly the Broncos are VERY similar to us this season. 3-0 played shitty teams like we did. Lost 2 in a row one against a good team and another against a 1-3 team that the media had dead in the water.

It's actually crazy when you look at it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
User Name Explorer

User Name

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

This is the same weapons we had last season when Joe Brady was the talk of the league; trade Marshall for Samuel & Mike Davis for Hubbard. 

Ball distribution was much better almost had 3 separate 1000 yard receivers. Robby Anderson was considered a steal in free agency and underrated signing. Now he's lazy and can't run routes. 

This place is amazing lol. yea every position is subpar on offense this season, even the Qb play. 

 

The NFL caught up to Brady PDQ. He's just not a good play caller yet, repetitive and predictable in the long game, doesn't seem to adjust at all. He's been indirectly called out by several opponents for this, and likely what set Robbie off on Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I think dealing Arnold was a mistake.  He isn’t Kelce but he was solid and consistent part of the gameplan.   You need guys like that.   I like what I see in Tremble but he isn’t Arnold yet 

*If focused on the present day Panthers 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, User Name said:

The NFL caught up to Brady PDQ. He's just not a good play caller yet, repetitive and predictable in the long game, doesn't seem to adjust at all. He's been indirectly called out by several opponents for this, and likely what set Robbie off on Sunday. 

I think Robbie is most upset that he has gone right back to being what he always has been after his one season….

Robby also simply isn’t playing good football of late.   And a lot do that has nothing to do with Joe Brady and is all Robby. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think dealing Arnold was a mistake.  He isn’t Kelce but he was solid and consistent part of the gameplan.   You need guys like that.   I like what I see in Tremble but he isn’t Arnold yet 

*If focused on the present day Panthers 

It's not out of the question that dealing him was a poo move. The early talk was pro Fitts and I still do like him and what he's done/how he goes about it but yea that could end up being a poo move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, CRA said:

I think Robbie is most upset that he has gone right back to being what he always has been after his one season….

Robby also simply isn’t playing good football of late.   And a lot do that has nothing to do with Joe Brady and is all Robby. 

IMO Robby needs to play stronger. I know he's a speed guy but some of his routes round off and aren't even that crisp really. He can def improve no doubt

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Fox007 said:

It's not out of the question that dealing him was a poo move. The early talk was pro Fitts and I still do like him and what he's done/how he goes about it but yea that could end up being a poo move.

I'd say whether or not it winds up being a bad move overall has a lot to do with how CJ Henderson develops.

But does it contribute to where we are now? Yeah, probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd say whether or not it winds up being a bad move overall has a lot to do with how CJ Henderson develops.

But does it contribute to where we are now? Yeah, probably.

They also said that you will miss on some moves and they will be doing moves regardless and I agree with that also. If it turns out we got that one wrong oh well I like the aggressiveness and will continue to root for that type of poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, Fox007 said:

It's not out of the question that dealing him was a poo move. The early talk was pro Fitts and I still do like him and what he's done/how he goes about it but yea that could end up being a poo move.

Well going back to the draft my worry about the new GM was his Seattle ties and what he witnessed there….a historic D build oddly off the secondary.  

It’s why I felt he would go Horn at #8.  Despite DB not being the right back given what we are/we’re.  He seems overly committed to DBs at this stage.   And the Seattle OL went to poo while he was there.

I would have rather kept Arnold.  Especially if the claim is to rehabilitate Darnold.  Nothing about this roster really says that.  OL is utter trash.  That’s never never made sense with the claim that they thought they could fix Sam.   You then trade away a super solid TE that Darnold had decent chemistry with….and Darnold keeps looking worse ever sense.   

granted CMC is out.  But his favorite two non-CMC targets were Moore and Arnold. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
User Name Explorer

User Name

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think Robbie is most upset that he has gone right back to being what he always has been after his one season….

Robby also simply isn’t playing good football of late.   And a lot do that has nothing to do with Joe Brady and is all Robby. 

Maybe so, but what upset him Sunday was the lack of adjustment. He recognized the Eagles had the playbook... 

He wanted us to double move,” Rhule said Monday. “They were sitting on some routes. He wanted us to double move, stutter and go.”

Brady should have seen it first and adjusted, he did not. Sam's last pick was a terrible throw, but it doesn't help when the CB knows exactly where the ball is going vs biting on a comeback while Robby blows past on a double.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Fox007 said:

They also said that you will miss on some moves and they will be doing moves regardless and I agree with that also. If it turns out we got that one wrong oh well I like the aggressiveness and will continue to root for that type of poo.

The same GM who led the Redskins to four Super Bowls traded multiple picks to move up and draft Ryan Leaf (Bobby Beathard).

Likewise, Ozzie Newsome was one of the best GMs ever but was far from perfect.

Nobody's perfect, or even close to it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Friday camp news and notes

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...