Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are #24 on Forbes' 2021 "Team Value" list


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is from August, before the season started (didn't see it posted earlier).  https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2021/08/05/the-nfls-most-valuable-teams-2021-average-team-value-soars-to-35-billion-as-league-shrugs-off-pandemic-year/

image.png.87ffc4dab2123ffec447c9fcafcc6753.png

The breakdown is a bit more interesting

image.png.14aef09668181cf42930d33e0f91fce6.png

 

Forbes says that the change in value from 2020 to 2021 is up 14%. 

The "win-to-player-cost-ratio" is 58 (compared to, let's say, the Bucs who's win-to-cost ratio is super high at 215, or the Seahawks at 133.)  someone with better insight can share whether a high ratio or a low ratio is good.   The Jaguars' ratio is just 15.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigpoppa said:

That "revenue per fan" statistic really makes you feel good about how they see us

oooh, hadn't see that.  Interesting.

Houston, Seattle: $13

Dolphins: $10

Packers: $183

Chargers: $4

 

wonder if it's based on merch sales or something similarly able to determine who is "a fan" and what comprises the fan revenue.   The article isn't good in showing the footnote detail

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

oooh, hadn't see that.  Interesting.

Houston, Seattle: $13

Dolphins: $10

Packers: $183

Chargers: $4

 

wonder if it's based on merch sales or something similarly able to determine who is "a fan" and what comprises the fan revenue.   The article isn't good in showing the footnote detail

It says it is, "Local revenues divided by metro population, with populations in two-team markets divided in half."

So, basically our local revenue divided by the population of the Charlotte Metro area.

 

There are some other interesting tibits on there, like the Market Value($139M) and Brand($91M). Compare that to another small market team with a giant presence, the Green Bay Packers with a Market Value of $210M and Brand value of $264M. Another interesting comparison is a market roughly double the size of CLT metro, the Arizona Cardinals. Market Value of $136M and Brand value of $101M.

Interesting to see their valuations. It would be helpful to see behind the curtain a little on how they came up with some of these figures.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Surely, since Young is the qb he is, a 3 year NFL starter, a qb with exceptional command of a playoff team, and many of us are just too stupid and blind to recognize, he will have no trouble mopping the floor with anyone from this list of has-beens and never-weres.
    • After two seasons, I definitely have strong opinions of his playcalling and even stronger ones on his game coaching abilities.  Isolating AT as logic for BY success doesn't make any sense. Look at his body of work, his ratings in intermediate and deep, his bad throw percentages or FOR fuging SURE his terrible footwork. As I have continued to stress, he is an arm throwing, scrambling QB with significantly below average arm strength and underwhelming athletic ability for a modern QB. The "clutch" stuff is a lot of wishful thinking for a guy with a very low career winning percentage. I have never heard clutch attached to a QB that has the kind of winning percentage that he does. It doesn't logically make sense. I understand you are keeping your hope alive but most of us can see what I think you will eventually come to realize, he just isn't an NFL caliber QB.  Sunk cost fallacy is holding onto assets in the hope of recovering a return, rather than taking your losses and reinvesting them into something that may pay off. This is the exact opposite of sunk cost fallacy by keeping a failed asset. He has to be one of the football dumbest players we have ever had in the history of this franchise. Easily the most football dumb 1st round draft pick. Yeah well he seems to fug that up pretty often too. Further back into the stands, I would say.
    • I had no idea that this dude was our offensive coordinator Brad Idzik. 
×
×
  • Create New...