Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

wATs0N pIcKEd MiaMi...WRONG


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

Confirmed waived clause vs. ‘no impediment’. 
 

So as I understand it, many of you feel this means the same thing and can’t possible mean something along the lines of, at the very least, Miami first, Panthers possible if things fail?

The question still stands. Why has the no clause waiver been reported for Miami but not Carolina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SizzleBuzz said:

image.thumb.png.9317fc091686fa1a1acc6d6f80970e7f.png

That doesn’t answer the question. It’s not the same as Watson waiving the clause for Carolina, which hasn’t been reported.

Why?

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

There was no "confirmation" there...

...none whatsoever.

It holds as much weight as Person saying there was no ‘impediment’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I've flipped on wanting Watson here at this time, I have not and I do not, but it's easy to read all of the (conflicting?) reports on his status regarding Carolina and make most of them agree.  Especially without knowing the details of how the process plays out the mental gymnastics are kinda teeny (even if we discount that there is likely more to every involved team's interactions with the Texans than are being fed to reporters).

Is waiving the trade clause an actual, written act?  If so maybe it simply has only come up with Miami because they believe or believed they are closer to a deal there.  Someone's tweet when this all blew up a few days ago about it being good for Miami if it happened fast and good for other teams if it happened slowly can fit this narrative too.  It's a short leap to he's indicated he will but he hasn't had to yet.

Personally I think what's been reported since early this year (that he's already told them / they are aware of where he's willing to go) applies and the rest of it is people, mostly reporters, trying to make something new out of old information.   

 

Edited by mwright350
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Exactly...

If you read any article on the subject and there is a lot, they reference Ian, who covers the entire league and is more widely respected, and point outs the fact other teams were not waived other than Miami and while it doesn’t mean they won’t be in the future, Watson has waived for Miami right now.

But this is way off base for any confirmation?

Meanwhile a Panthers writer unknown to the rest of the NFL claims there is no ‘impediment’ and this basically means the clause pretty much was waived for Carolina since it’s not a problem and a thread Watson didn’t choose Miami is valid.

Yea my brain doesn’t follow that. Pretty clear Watson wants Miami first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, onmyown said:

If you read any article on the subject and there is a lot, they reference Ian, who covers the entire league and is more widely respected, and point outs the fact other teams were not waived other than Miami and while it doesn’t mean they won’t be in the future, Watson has waived for Miami right now.

But this is way off base for any confirmation?

Meanwhile a Panthers writer unknown to the rest of the NFL claims there is no ‘impediment’ and this basically means the clause pretty much was waived for Carolina since it’s not a problem and a thread Watson didn’t choose Miami is valid.

image.thumb.png.f5c8d80ec2d9d358921e1a6640a679f2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

image.thumb.png.f5c8d80ec2d9d358921e1a6640a679f2.png

Great, our team’s beat writer ‘was told’ there was no impediment. Excellent. Get it.

Meanwhile Watson has only waived his no trade clause for Miami.

Watson did not choose Miami confirmed!

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...