Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This “analytics” conditioning is garbage


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Most of our major injuries this year came from non contact plays. The only thing prevented from making football "soft" as you say is concussions. 

So great comparison!

Injuries accumulate over time with repeated stress, like contact plays. Despite a player going out on one specific play, the injury often has been building up to the point where it will cause failure.

So thanks for again illustrating that you have no idea what you're talking about!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panther'sBigD said:

Injuries accumulate over time with repeated stress, like contact plays. Despite a player going out on one specific play, the injury often has been building up to the point where it will cause failure.

So thanks for again illustrating that you have no idea what you're talking about!

This is a very good take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Squid Game said:

Go check out how well the Charlotte Hornets have done in the drafts since they got rid of that stupid “analytic genius” Rich Cho at GM for one who has the eye talent for good players. 
 

Rich Cho’s picks: Kemba, MKG**, Zeller**, Vonleh**, Kaminsky**, Monk**   (**bust)

 

Mitch Kupchak: Bridges, PJ, LaMelo, Bouknight/Kai (too early) 


 

David Tepper is such a stupid sport owner. When he finally realize that this is football and not the stock market where math/analytic doesn’t play a big part in, we’ll start winning. 
 

Analytics should only be .05% of the equation.

Stupid math nerds that have no idea what they are looking at trying to make themselves relevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading this post I wasn't sure if it was about injuries since that was talked about the most. Analytics is a part of football beginning around middle school and in every sport! Analytics=Statistics that's all Analytics is it is based off what has already happened to predict what could happen. Analytics has nothing to do with injures or how hard a team practices for upcoming games. Tepper has no control over how preparation is done and the only connection to a stock market is Analytics which is a prediction from past happenings on how to prepare/predict future happenings!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2021 at 6:21 PM, mc52beast said:

Is it analytics that tells our staff to throw the freaking ball a trillion times when our o-line is Swiss cheese and our qb is seeing ghosts…

Actually it is because the previous teams that played their opponents that week has showed that the team their playing is weak on defending the passing game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...