Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should We Be Concerned About The Run Defense?


rey2009

Recommended Posts

so we all know how abused we were by the running game during the first 3 weeks of the season...then the bye week came, we picked up hollis thomas and i think alot of us might have been fooled by our success against the run over the next 5 weeks...here's where those 5 teams ranked in rushing offense

WAS - 19th

TB - 25th

BUF - 18th

ARI - 31st

NO - 5th (getting out to a 17-3 lead kinda forced them to abandon the run...plus, they have no problems throwing it)

ATL is ranked 9th...i bring this up b/c last week we were very fortunate that turner left the game with an injury...he was absolutely abusing us...i just wonder if the run defense really improved after the bye week or if it was just a matter of playing teams that aren't even ranked in the top half of the league in rushing offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe our pass defense is rated quite highly. That's easy to figure out, our run defense stinks. Turner was eating us up last Sunday until he was injured. The Dolphins ran on us all night, and that set up some critical passes that they completed. And this from a team who lost their best player this week, and are starting a backup QB! While I do see more fire and attitude in our defense, qualities that were sorely lacking late last season, we are giving up far too many rushing yards. I think losing Davis is a big reason for that. Until we adequately replace him, we'll see more of the same against teams with good running attacks..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes...and No it's a combination of Meeks defense + lacking a True Run Stuffer, while hollis has been the best Stop Gap player we've picked up in a long time.Having Kemo is significant because he frees up space for our LB's to make plays, just look at Beason's stats.

And we really miss TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're the epitome of a Meeks defense and look very much like the Colts D while he was there. Good against the pass, terrible against the run.

We just can't hang 30+ on another team and let the D pin their ears back.

Exactly! meeks defenses were always weak against the run, but has always been good agianst the pass. But also his defenses have also caused a lot of to's and and was good in points allowed. this d should be a good fit for our o, not too aggressive and doesnt give up big plays and points. think about it. We held them to 14 points for 3 quarters. we couldnt score more than 14 in 3 quarters!! sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly! meeks defenses were always weak against the run, but has always been good agianst the pass. But also his defenses have also caused a lot of to's and and was good in points allowed. this d should be a good fit for our o, not too aggressive and doesnt give up big plays and points. think about it. We held them to 14 points for 3 quarters. we couldnt score more than 14 in 3 quarters!! sad.

There's a lot of truth to that, but good reasons for it as well. With the offense the Colts had, able to put up bunches of points quickly, they were able to consistently keep teams behind score wise, requiring those teams to HAVE to pass the ball, especially late in a game. Also, while the Colts run defense was often maligned, the year they won the SB their run defense came together quite well late in the season and in the playoffs. New Orleans is showing many of the same tendencies this year that those Colt teams had, they can be ran on, but when you're consistently down score wise, especially in the second half, the run isn't going to help much, and thus, their defense is in position to play the pass only, and their defense is scoring a lot of points because of that, via INTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The last child @ home has told me he wants to go to a game, so we're seeing vs Rams on the 30th
    • Did we really shut them down though? They had 369 yards of offense.   That is 9 more yards than they average per game and 53 more than we give up per game this year.   If a team gave up 369 yards per game on defense, they'd be the 7th worst defense in the league this year. Yes, I will give our defense credit for having the 4th down stand near our goal line as well as creating the fumble that stopped their first drive, as they did rise to the occasion then, but even the INT was just a ridiculous play/throw and handed it to us and they also missed a FG. We didn't force them into a single punt all game.  We had 1 sack on a QB who had 37 pass attempts. They had drives of 56, 49, 50, 43, 58, and 71 yards (while we only had 2 over 40 yards ourselves). We bent, a lot, but never really broke, partially due to the Packers own mistakes, that's a far cry from "shutting them down" in my opinion.  Again, this is why I'm critical of us after a day like today, I'm able to look beyond a final score and evaluate how we played on the whole, and we keep squeaking out these wins despite not playing well at all.  And yes, that is what great teams do, but they also play well in the majority of their games, where as all we seem to do is squeak out ugly wins without ever playing all that well. I'm not saying I'm unhappy that we won, I've never once said anything like that, but when week after week I see serious concerns with how we played, then I'm going to call out what I see.
    • Washington is going to have to do better than this
×
×
  • Create New...