Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Mike Vick Join Panthers?

Julian17

By Julian17,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Sultan33g Newbie

Sultan33g

Posted
Posted

Im with you! Im for drafting a Qb to. Thats even taking a chance! When you talk MV you see the haters swarming in! With nothing to back up the hate! If he does fail, look how we are with Joke! We fail every season!:hand:

damn those legs on that avatar would choke a muthafuka out!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
micnificent28 Mentor

micnificent28

Posted
Posted

u kno its funni how mani people still back "joke" after how horrible hes been this season. throwing pick after pick and i dont ever remember vick having a game as bad none the less a season like jake is. but he still has supporters!!!!wtf whats with the vick hate hes oviousli still a better option than jakes ever been. somethings not right with the responces people are giving to vick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

u kno its funni how mani people still back "joke" after how horrible hes been this season. throwing pick after pick and i dont ever remember vick having a game as bad none the less a season like jake is. but he still has supporters!!!!wtf whats with the vick hate hes oviousli still a better option than jakes ever been. somethings not right with the responces people are giving to vick

Is your Y-key broken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

i think he well do good in the team i think we should let jake play 1st half and let mike play 2nd half to see if he still got it the eagles re useing him wrong just for wildcat think he should do better thats why i think he well do better with the panthers i think he old be his old self like he did in altanta lets give him a chance

i never thought about michael vick playing for the panthers until now it sounds like a really great and realistic option and that dividing their playing by halves is so brilliant i just woke up from beating myself in the head and wishing i could murder dumbasses

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherDude Newbie

PantherDude

Posted
Posted

Why are people bashing this idea? Sure, the kid's a moron, but if we had signed Vick in the offseason and given him control of the offense, we'd have a better record than 4-6 right now and would still be in the playoff chase.

Doubt it. Vick is a RB, not a QB. Without his speed, he would've been worse than he already is. I want a speedy QB, not a speedy RB who try to be a QB.

You guys honestly think that Vick would have played more poorly than Jake has this season?

That's possible. He also not that good at protecting the ball compare to Jake. Sure Jake has fumble the ball before, but he at least never hold the balls out often that give the defense a chance to strip it easier compare to Vick. Heck, many times Jake protect the ball well when he run than Vick. :D

No starting quarterback in the league can currently say that they've played worse than Jake has, I find it highly unlikely that Vick would.

Uh.....Russell & Quinn played worse perhaps? Heck, there is a reason why Raiders just benched Russell when he was suppose to be the starter last year & this year.

Brady Quinn just got off a game where he threw for four touchdowns and zero interceptions. He did that with absolutely nothing to work with anywhere on the offense.

Against a team....as shitty as them!! Weak comparsion there. Even Jake would have that kind of play against that Lions team the Browns faced.

Brady Quinn >>>>>>>> Jake Delhomme

Sorry, but Quinn hasn't shown enough to say he is better than Jake. Unless he can do more & help the team get some winning records, Quinn is likely going to be a bust. Several Huddlers has mention he could be before the Browns got him in the Draft 2 yrs. ago. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rello Newbie

Rello

Posted
Posted

I would take Vick in a heartbeat and I used to be a Vick hater. Why not sign Vick? If he can continue to improve and get back to his old form then I'm all for it. Delhomme has been killing our team, wasting Smith's career and I'm sick of it. You can bash me, call me names ect but even Dan Morgan said on " Mack & Mack" that it would be a good idea to sign Vick. So I guess Morgan is a troll like the TS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

I would take Vick in a heartbeat and I used to be a Vick hater. Why not sign Vick? If he can continue to improve and get back to his old form then I'm all for it. Delhomme has been killing our team, wasting Smith's career and I'm sick of it. You can bash me, call me names ect but even Dan Morgan said on " Mack & Mack" that it would be a good idea to sign Vick. So I guess Morgan is a troll like the TS?

If you think Jake struggles to get Smith the ball, lol you would really hate Vicks inaptness. And nothing on "Mack" show is relevant, is that even still on?

Roddy White's career shot off after the departure of Vick... and that includes the 2007 scrub QB carousel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...