Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For all the Brady Christensen fans....


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m assuming it was the fact we didn’t give him a chance almost all season while shuffling him around the line and starting terrible vets over him. Brady could be a nice pick considering where we drafted him. 

Has nothing to do with it. 

To me it signifies lazy. If you don't know how to maintain pad level. Stay in a loaded position. Get in a stance by the time you get to the NFL then you are a slug.

It's inexcusable the lack of fundamentals you see across the NFL these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

@Catsfan69 have you literally ever made a constructive post that has actually added to a conversation? Your entire posting persona is that of a stereotypical grumpy old boomer.

He asked if moving him around kept him from developing technique.

I answered. The basic fundamentals of all offensive and defensive line play are the same from HS to College. Pad level, hand placement, being violent, good loaded hips. These are all very basic things.

You should not need to be taught these things at the NFL level. 

At this level you should only need to fine tune little things that last 3 to 5 percent of technique that makes you excellent. 

So no to answer the posters question moving him around isn't his main issue. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expounding on that Coordinators are probably erroneously thinking they can cut individual periods because the players should have this down already.

They probably should give them 4 periods at least. My God I can't see how you need more than 16 team periods. But who knows how much install is taking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Has nothing to do with it. 

To me it signifies lazy. If you don't know how to maintain pad level. Stay in a loaded position. Get in a stance by the time you get to the NFL then you are a slug.

It's inexcusable the lack of fundamentals you see across the NFL these days.

If you think shuffling a 3rd round rookie around the line doesn’t hurt development I honestly don’t know what else to say.

The poster I was responding too was questioning if the OP thought BC was not a good pick because we didn’t evaluate him well. I was explaining he was probably more upset with how Rhule handled BC not how they evaluated him. However you want to look at it, it still falls on Rhule who drafted him. Did he draft a player with bad technique or did he do a terrible job at coaching/developing that player. Looking at the regressions from Brown and Chinn, I would lean towards the coaching/development. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

If you think shuffling a 3rd round rookie around the line doesn’t hurt development I honestly don’t know what else to say.

The poster I was responding too was questioning if the OP thought BC was not a good pick because we didn’t evaluate him well. I was explaining he was probably more upset with how Rhule handled BC not how they evaluated him. However you want to look at it, it still falls on Rhule who drafted him. Did he draft a player with bad technique or did he do a terrible job at coaching/developing that player. Looking at the regressions from Brown and Chinn, I would lean towards the coaching/development. 

You don't get it.

 

These aren't positional issues. 

I'm not sure what your playing experience is with regards to front 7 but things like loading hips are the same for all players.

Pad level isn't position specific. 

Playing within your base (in balance) isn't positional.

Look at that film they used. Brady is either straight up (pad level issue) or way out over his feet (not in balance.

These are things that should have been cleared up in HS much less college. 

He can't be physical not because he is weak. He can't be physical because he can't (or won't) get himself in a body position to be physical. 

If I had access to tape and a telestrator I would be glad to draw lines on his body.

 

He needs to fix these big things before he needs to worry about small positional techniques. 

Did I explain that sufficiently? If not I can try to reword it for you. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You don't get it.

 

These aren't positional issues. 

I'm not sure what your playing experience is with regards to front 7 but things like loading hips are the same for all players.

Pad level isn't position specific. 

Playing within your base (in balance) isn't positional.

Look at that film they used. Brady is either straight up (pad level issue) or way out over his feet (not in balance.

These are things that should have been cleared up in HS much less college. 

He can't be physical not because he is weak. He can't be physical because he can't (or won't) get himself in a body position to be physical. 

If I had access to tape and a telestrator I would be glad to draw lines on his body.

 

He needs to fix these big things before he needs to worry about small positional techniques. 

Did I explain that sufficiently? If not I can try to reword it for you. 

His technique was considered a strength by draft analysts before Rhule drafted him.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/brady-christensen-nfl-draft-player-profile-byu-offensive-tackle/

https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/.amp/gm-report/seahawks-2021-nfl-draft-profile-brady-christensen

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2931245-brady-christensen-nfl-draft-2021-scouting-report-for-carolina-panthers-ot.amp.html
 

The phrases you will keep seeing under strength are “fundamentally sound” “High Football IQ” in which they brag on his techniques. His weaknesses were athleticism and competition at BYU. These guys do this for a living, but you played ball back in 1952 for some small town High School so you know better right? 
 

So yeah moving him all over the place and being a terrible developer of talent probably overwhelmed the guy where he forfeits his basic skills and tries to overcompensate. It’s like when a QB gets pressure and throws off his back foot. Does he know better? Sure, but the moment can become overwhelming and they get desperate trying to make a play (or stop a sack). 

No matter how you look at it, it still falls back on Rhule. He scouted, evaluated, drafted, coached and developed BC. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting your feet set is a positional issue. Tackles have more room to open up than guards or center. The movement for blocking for guard is different than tackle. If you don't think footwork matters, intentionally shorten your natural stride by 2 inches and watch how much you struggle to keep that adjustment and how much it affects everything you do. 

Also, he's now going up against what were before elite level players. He could very well be overcompensating for their level of skill and power. That's why coaching is important. To teach them how to adjust to the new level of competition. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Getting your feet set is a positional issue. Tackles have more room to open up than guards or center. The movement for blocking for guard is different than tackle. If you don't think footwork matters, intentionally shorten your natural stride by 2 inches and watch how much you struggle to keep that adjustment and how much it affects everything you do. 

Also, he's now going up against what were before elite level players. He could very well be overcompensating for their level of skill and power. That's why coaching is important. To teach them how to adjust to the new level of competition. 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

His technique was considered a strength by draft analysts before Rhule drafted him.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/brady-christensen-nfl-draft-player-profile-byu-offensive-tackle/

https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/.amp/gm-report/seahawks-2021-nfl-draft-profile-brady-christensen

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2931245-brady-christensen-nfl-draft-2021-scouting-report-for-carolina-panthers-ot.amp.html
 

The phrases you will keep seeing under strength are “fundamentally sound” “High Football IQ” in which they brag on his techniques. His weaknesses were athleticism and competition at BYU. These guys do this for a living, but you played ball back in 1952 for some small town High School so you know better right? 
 

So yeah moving him all over the place and being a terrible developer of talent probably overwhelmed the guy where he forfeits his basic skills and tries to overcompensate. It’s like when a QB gets pressure and throws off his back foot. Does he know better? Sure, but the moment can become overwhelming and they get desperate trying to make a play (or stop a sack). 

No matter how you look at it, it still falls back on Rhule. He scouted, evaluated, drafted, coached and developed BC. 

Did you watch the video? The same things I'm saying Wahle is saying.

It falls on Rhule but it also falls on Brady himself.

These should not be advanced concepts for him. He should have fixed this on his own a long time ago if he wanted to be great. No matter who the coach is. No matter what's going on. The onus will always be on the individual player to strive to be the best in the world at what he does.

You can't get taller. You can get marginally stronger without pharmaceutical help. The one thing you have absolute control over is your own fundamentals.

Hours and hours of taking one step and freezing in position. Then taking two steps and freezing in position. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Getting your feet set is a positional issue. Tackles have more room to open up than guards or center. The movement for blocking for guard is different than tackle. If you don't think footwork matters, intentionally shorten your natural stride by 2 inches and watch how much you struggle to keep that adjustment and how much it affects everything you do. 

Also, he's now going up against what were before elite level players. He could very well be overcompensating for their level of skill and power. That's why coaching is important. To teach them how to adjust to the new level of competition. 

You are getting too in the weeds. He has basic fundamental issues that shouldn't exist at this point.

Yes my first step might be different at tackle vs guard. My pad level isn't.  My hip load isn't my punch isn't. 

Like the guys on the podcast I don't like his stance. These are basics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are getting too in the weeds. He has basic fundamental issues that shouldn't exist at this point.

Yes my first step might be different at tackle vs guard. My pad level isn't.  My hip load isn't my punch isn't. 

Like the guys on the podcast I don't like his stance. These are basics. 

 If every coach at every level could teach perfect fundamentals every player would have them. They don't. There's only a few elite level tackles every year because they don't all have these basic fundamentals. 

First step is different, but so is the second and the third. Tackles face more speed rushers where guards face more power rushers. Tackles slide laterally more often, guards get pushed backwards. Defenders use different hand movements. 

Again, we're talking 2 different positions. Guard is not his natural position. He probably has to think about it because it's not what he does on a regular basis. His blocking assignments are also different. Put him in 4 different positions and yeah, you can't expect him to look good because everything he is doing is constantly different. 

I'm not saying he's going to be great or even good. I'm just saying to expect a 1st round level performance from him with Rhay-Z as his HC is a little much. Fundamentals can be fixed. He can be taught. That's why we have offensive line coaches. Just try teaching him 1 spot first instead of 4. And by someone who actually knows that a tackle doesn't have to fit certain measurements to be all pro level. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...