Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Willis vs Corral


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

People comparing Willis to RW and DW are nuts. Watson was a dominant college Qb for three years at the highest level of CFB. Wilson was elite at two different schools and took his team to a rose bowl. It’s apples and oranges. Willis is a COMPLETE unknown. Anyone that tells you different is lying and it’s all going to be about his development and how much more a great staff can get out of him. 
 

Corral has a ton of physical upside imo. He’s a beanpole right now. I know the NFL weight program isn’t AS BIG a deal with QB. But go back and look at college highlights of Aaron Rodgers and Ben Roethlisberger. I think the biggest knock on Corral right now is he’s slight. But he has major growth potential physically and with his mentality….could be stellar. 

Edited by unicar15
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Corral has a ton of physical upside imo. He’s a beanpole right now. I know the NFL weight program isn’t AS BIG a deal with QB. But go back and look at college highlights of Aaron Rodgers and Ben Roethlisberger. I think the biggest knock on Corral right now is he’s slight. But he has major growth potential physically and with his mentality….could be stellar. 

With access to an NFL strength & conditioning program and nutritionists, It's pretty reasonable to think that Corral can put on 10 or 15 pounds in his first year or two.  With his height and frame, that shouldn't be a problem.  And at that size he should be plenty big enough to withstand the rigors of an NFL season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the point I’m trying to get at is it seems a lot of people have gotten to this well-rounded perspective with Corral and prefer him. But then everything we here from the scouting insiders, The Athletic, and a few other spots indicate otherwise. Mostly that it’s Willis and Pickett then Corral is in a lower tier low first/high second. Howell and Strong not far behind. And Ridder is high but just on a few team boards. Same with Glass.

Just curious to what the team scouts don’t see in Corral that they do with Willis. Very possible this draft has an active late 1st/Early 2nd round for QBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, davos said:

I guess the point I’m trying to get at is it seems a lot of people have gotten to this well-rounded perspective with Corral and prefer him. But then everything we here from the scouting insiders, The Athletic, and a few other spots indicate otherwise. Mostly that it’s Willis and Pickett then Corral is in a lower tier low first/high second. Howell and Strong not far behind. And Ridder is high but just on a few team boards. Same with Glass.

Just curious to what the team scouts don’t see in Corral that they do with Willis. Very possible this draft has an active late 1st/Early 2nd round for QBs. 

I'd say this is accurate and I'd bet a lot of the preference for Willis and Pickett is due to recency bias.  Those two threw at the Combine.  Corral did not (due to the ankle injury he had in the bowl game).  

Which goes to show that for QB, the Combine can hurt a team's decision making process as much as it helps it.  Guys throwing bombs in shorts and t-shirts get all the ooo's and ahhh's from the scouts but that doesn't show how the QB can diagnose a defense, look off a safety or make the right throw given the coverage.  Only tape shows that.  And those skills ultimately project best to NFL success.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cant take him seriously because he likes Bryce sounds about right for around here 
    • OK, let me first say that I can't get any Twitter link to embed--using "X" or "Twitter" or whatever, and I'm tired of trying. Now, I must say that I see Panthers stuff in Facebook on occasion as I'm part of some group, but I see Panthers stuff even less on the cesspool that is now X, but as a follower of the official Panthers Twitter, stuff pops up on that feed too. I guess that I shouldn't be surprised that agents of the organization would be putting out tweets like this: He's not even trying to be objective. It stands to make sense though. In order to get better information, you have to go to national sources like Kurt Warner.  I'm not necessarily trying to pick on J-Stew, per se, but I can't take him seriously, as even some past Panthers players, like Greg Olsen for example, don't seem like they're just trying to cater to Panthers Nation, just saying hollow words to make everyone feel good.  I just wonder why here on the Carolina Huddle, there seems to be more objectivity, or at least more critical thinking and serious discussion than most other social media sources on the Panthers. It's interesting. There is a significant difference.  For all the changes and the seeming decline in popularity to whatever degree, the Carolina Huddle still has its place and plays a big part in overall Panthers fandom. We want to be happy, joyous and cheer for the Panthers, but we aren't necessarily trying to shoot sunshine up people's derrières either.  
×
×
  • Create New...