Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the NFL quit giving No-Trade Clauses out (Not a Watson thread)


Chiefzack
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Parity is necessary for my interest. If you go into a season with only a small handful of teams having a legit chance what's the point?

This is exactly how I feel about NCAA football. Every season you know Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, Clemson, ND (although that could change with the Kelly departure) and one or two others will be in the top 8; four of those teams will make the playoff. Those teams may still dominate an expanded playoff, but the season would be much more exciting if a few more teams were given a shot at competing for the NCAA title.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

This is exactly how I feel about NCAA football. Every season you know Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, Clemson, ND (although that could change with the Kelly departure) and one or two others will be in the top 8; four of those teams will make the playoff. Those teams may still dominate an expanded playoff, but the season would be much more exciting if a few more teams were given a shot at competing for the NCAA title.

I think 8 is the perfect number. It doesn't matter how many teams you have, you'll have people screaming about getting snubbed. Hell, you have people screaming about getting snubbed out of a 68 team field in the basketball tournament. I'm sorry, if you're on the bubble of a 68 team field you have zero shot anyway. Shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't blame the players for utilizing their leverage but I will say that the "super team" era that it spawned in the NBA pretty quickly led to me just tuning the NBA out. I was an avid NBA fan growing up and I bet I haven't watched a full NBA game in at least a decade

 

Honestly the NBA is pretty damn amazing right now, and I say this as someone who didn't care as much for it 5 years ago.  But you should get back into it.  So many amazing young players and really super teams aren't that much of a thing.  Suns/Bucks was the finals last year and this year there's a bunch of teams I could see making the finals.

I don't want to say super teams aren't really a thing anymore... but they haven't been lately.  I mean you had the Nets with KD/Irivng/Harden and look how that worked out.  The best team in the NBA very well might be the Suns and they built their team through the draft outside of Chris Paul, who isn't even playing right now.  You got the Bucks who drafted Giannis and made smart signings to build around him.  Bulls did sign Lonzo and DeMar, but neither of those are super-team level talents (although DeRozan has been insane this year) and Lavine was already on the team.  Lot of other really strong, fun teams to watch too like the Grizz, Mavs, Celtics, Cavs, and Jazz... all homegrown teams with budding young stars. Hell then you have the Pelicans if Zion can get healthy, Zion/Ingram/McCollum would be filthy.  And Nuggets, another homegrown team, has a top-3 player in the NBA (Jokic) and Jamal Murray will return someday.  

If Kawhi and PG get healthy for the postseason, then the Clippers are nasty too... but to be fair they might fit under your Super Team criteria, but they are still very beatable.  Even if not, they have incredible depth.

Basically I don't think there has been a better time to get back into the NBA.  This isn't like 5 years ago where you could pencil in a Cavs/Warriors finals, or when you just knew the Heat would make it to the finals.  There's a bunch of parity currently.  Hell even now with the Sixers with Embiid and Harden, I don't think they are invincible.  Their reliance on free-throw shooting is going to bite them in the ass in the playoffs.  I think the Heat or Bucks could beat them.  Nets/Sixers would be interesting depending on Kyrie. 

Honestly the Panthers are still my favorite sports team but I actually think the NBA is more entertaining currently than the NFL.  And that is something I never thought I would say.  I still love the NFL though, maybe if the Panthers didn't suck I could enjoy it more.

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mage said:

Honestly the NBA is pretty damn amazing right now, and I say this as someone who didn't care as much for it 5 years ago.  But you should get back into it.  So many amazing young players and really super teams aren't that much of a thing.  Suns/Bucks was the finals last year and this year there's a bunch of teams I could see making the finals.

I don't want to say super teams aren't really a thing anymore... but they haven't been lately.  I mean you had the Nets with KD/Irivng/Harden and look how that worked out.  The best team in the NBA very well might be the Suns and they built their team through the draft outside of Chris Paul, who isn't even playing right now.  You got the Bucks who drafted Giannis and made smart signings to build around him.  Bulls did sign Lonzo and DeMar, but neither of those are super-team level talents (although DeRozan has been insane this year) and Lavine was already on the team.  Lot of other really strong, fun teams to watch too like the Grizz, Mavs, Celtics, Cavs, and Jazz... all homegrown teams with budding young stars. Hell then you have the Pelicans if Zion can get healthy, Zion/Ingram/McCollum would be filthy.  And Nuggets, another homegrown team, has a top-3 player in the NBA (Jokic) and Jamal Murray will return someday.  

If Kawhi and PG get healthy for the postseason, then the Clippers are nasty too... but to be fair they might fit under your Super Team criteria, but they are still very beatable.  Even if not, they have incredible depth.

Basically I don't think there has been a better time to get back into the NBA.  This isn't like 5 years ago where you could pencil in a Cavs/Warriors finals, or when you just knew the Heat would make it to the finals.  There's a bunch of parity currently.  Hell even now with the Sixers with Embiid and Harden, I don't think they are invincible.  Their reliance on free-throw shooting is going to bite them in the ass in the playoffs.  I think the Heat or Bucks could beat them.  Nets/Sixers would be interesting depending on Kyrie. 

Honestly the Panthers are still my favorite sports team but I actually think the NBA is more entertaining currently than the NFL.  And that is something I never thought I would say.  I still love the NFL though, maybe if the Panthers didn't suck I could enjoy it more.

Nah. I'm souring on basketball overall. The game has just been ruined by soccerization IMO with the comical flopping everywhere. Minimal defense. Just jacking threes.

Basketball was hands down my favorite sport growing up, both in terms of playing and watching and now if the Heels aren't playing I'm not watching and I used to be religious about watching UNC. I probably miss a third of the games these days and half of those I honestly just forgot to watch. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nah. I'm souring on basketball overall. The game has just been ruined by soccerization IMO with the comical flopping everywhere. Minimal defense. Just jacking threes.

Fair enough.  I can't speak on college basketball because that has never been a huge interest of mine, but I think the NBA has gotten somewhat better in this regard.  Free throws are at an all-time low (although Harden/Embiid are going to get a ton of calls in Philly) and the new rule implemented last offseason has done a fantastic job at limiting how frequently guys can foul-bait on jump-shots like Harden and others would constantly do.  The 3-ball is still a big part of the game, but there's plenty of teams and players who have beautiful mid-range and inside games. DeRozan has been All-NBA caliber this season and his game is almost all mid-range offensively.  Arguably the top 2 MVP candidates are centers in Jokic and Embiid.  Durant is also someone who can shoot the 3-ball efficiently but his bread-and-butter is mid-range and overall just being a sniper. 

Obviously though if you simply don't enjoy basketball anymore I won't be changing your mind lol but I do think this is the best the league has been in a very long time.  Lot of different styles and lot of different way championship contenders have been built, I find it to be the perfect mixture.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...