Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Duke / UNC game thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

2 great universities, as well as numerous other colleges and universities.

Home of the Honda Jet engine and manufacturer. 
 

Neck and neck with producing engineers in the US with Raleigh.

Many other corporations.

 

Yall say things on feelings, rather than fact.

Greensboro is growing, and there are multiple reports that point to good signs.

Just a few years ago, Greensboro was just on multiple lists for city growth.

 

As a business city it’s fine but that doesn’t mean to much to me as I’m blessed to not have to worry about that. The overall city landscape just doesn’t seem to provide much. It’s similar to Raleigh for me I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:


I’m only saying this so you can be somewhat self-aware, if that’s something that matters….I don’t care one way or the other what your opinion is on anything….

but to tie this into a Panthers theme, your arguments in this thread are exactly that of lazy ass folks who say Cam Newton “only had one good year” and “was an awful passer” before rattling off stat after stat to prove their point, when it’s obvious they never actually watched any games Cam played and only went off highlights/lowlights from the national media. Kinda ironic how cam is in your username. 

Just because a city is building or it’s becoming better doesn’t mean it’s a great city.

In my opinion Chapel Hill is pound for pound a better city than Durham considering all things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know where Morgan's approach lies. Last draft looked like a lot of analytics. XL was definitely not the choice for someone who eyeball watched a lot of tape. One season of production does not a 1st round pick make. He was also involved in the Shitterer regime so there's that to consider as well. This draft looks very promising, but we also have to consider how many god awful players we had so we may have gotten more return than normal because our cupboards were already so bare.  I think we cut bait with Sam and Baker way too early. The "competition" between them was a joke. Of course we also had General OOU so there was that too. It's like the FO has been drunk the entire time Tepper has owned the team just to tolerate him. I can't make heads or tails of 90% of what's been done other than someone has a bottle or 12 in their desk drawer and keeps turning it up every time he walks through the door. 
    • Should and shouldn't are hypothetical.
    • That's partially why our front office ended up the way it did. Fitterer signed on to Tepper's heavily analytics based approach. Morgan prefers old school eyeball scouting. As far as "genes" our last few quarterbacks have had both the OMG and WTF genes. That's nothing new in Pantherland.bThe only difference was how far and how fast those throws went. 
×
×
  • Create New...