Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers 30-visits tracker


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

These RBs could be there with our 4th rounder.  Mid-rounds is where the value is this draft for RBs.  Even if we had our 2nd and 3rd rounder, I wouldn't be for drafting a RB with either of them.

There isn't value of there isn't room on the roster though. I have a hard time seeing a 4thbround rookie making our roster over CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard.

Mid-round picks are also where the value is often found with LBs and IOL. I'd rather spend picks there where a rookie would have a much stronger chance of sticking.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There isn't value of there isn't room on the roster though. I have a hard time seeing a 4thbround rookie making our roster over CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard.

Mid-round picks are also where the value is often found with LBs and IOL. I'd rather spend picks there where a rookie would have a much stronger chance of sticking.

 

Eh, we took Hubbard to be the #3 guy.  I'm not sold on Hubbard like apparently Mrs. Rhule is.  He lacks vision and has questionable hands.  He's an outside the tackles kind of player, which is ideal for a 3rd down back, but that requires good hands.  Foreman is a rental.  Most of these one-year guys are playing for a bigger payday in 2023.  They are playing on the assumption Rhule is a lame duck coach and trying to get snaps/film on them on this otherwise thin roster.  Foreman is counting on CMC missing time and getting significant #1, if not short yardage/goal line snaps and taking that to a bigger FA deal in 2023

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Eh, we took Hubbard last year to be the #3 guy.  I'm not sold on Hubbard like apparently Mrs. Rhule is.  He lacks vision and has questionable hands.  He's an outside the tackles kind of player, which is ideal for a 3rd down back, but that requires good hands.  Foreman is a rental.  Most of these one-year guys are playing for a bigger payday in 2023.  They are playing on the assumption Rhule is a lame duck coach and trying to get snaps/film on them on this otherwise thin roster.  Foreman is banking on CMC missing time and getting significant #1, if not short yardage/goal line snaps.

It's not about being sold on Hubbard long term. It's about him vs. a 4th round rookie on a roster full of holes and short on draft capital. Unless we're entertaining trading CMC, RB should pretty much be off the board unless there's just some unbelievably tremendous value available.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not about being sold on Hubbard long term. It's about him vs. a 4th round rookie on a roster full of holes and short on draft capital. Unless we're entertaining trading CMC, RB should pretty much be off the board unless there's just some unbelievably tremendous value available.

 

 

Or the injury bug comes back again, which is very possible.  With RBs, especially as the League has ever increasingly gone pass happy, mid-rounds usually have some dudes with a good deal of value.  They fall due to no fault of their own, but due to the RB position being devalued by a QB driven League.  Again, top 3 rounds (assuming we had those picks 2-3) nope, I'd pass...but round 4?  Sure if the value is too good to pass up...I'm all for it.  If a top 100 pick on our board is there in the 4th round and happens to be a RB, I wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Eh, we took Hubbard to be the #3 guy.  I'm not sold on Hubbard like apparently Mrs. Rhule is.  He lacks vision and has questionable hands.  He's an outside the tackles kind of player, which is ideal for a 3rd down back, but that requires good hands.  Foreman is a rental.  Most of these one-year guys are playing for a bigger payday in 2023.  They are playing on the assumption Rhule is a lame duck coach and trying to get snaps/film on them on this otherwise thin roster.  Foreman is counting on CMC missing time and getting significant #1, if not short yardage/goal line snaps and taking that to a bigger FA deal in 2023

I'd love to have kept Ameer Abdullah.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Samuel Womack is another non-Combine defensive back getting a lot of talk in the lead-up to the draft. Womack was a terrific cornerback at Toledo three years running and received a few draftable grades heading into the 2020 season. He decided to return for a second senior year. He’s a shorter corner (5’9″) with terrific ball skills and ran 4.37 seconds during Toledo’s Pro Day. His 32-inch arms somewhat offset his lack of vertical height.

Womack had an official top-30 visit with the Chiefs. He also privately worked out for the Washington Commanders, New Orleans Saints, Chicago Bears, and Carolina Panthers. I presently grade Womack as a seventh-round/PFA prospect.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-draft-news-and-rumors-alontae-taylor-joshua-williams-tariq-carpenter-and-others/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nfl-draft-news-and-rumors-alontae-taylor-joshua-williams-tariq-carpenter-and-others

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garrett Wilson, Ohio State

Quote

He’s already been on official 30 visits to see the New York Jets as well as the Carolina Panthers. The Washington Commanders also remain on his travel schedule.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-draft-news-and-rumors-team-visits-heat-up-for-garrett-wilson-charleston-rambo-christian-watson/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also hit the over.  Banking on Man City running up the score and Leeds getting a lucky strike.   
    • Tailed you.  Also Free Play, which is why the risk shows $0.00. Let me look at hoops and get back to you.  Always fade Hubert, haha. 
    • Hard to say right now, but good thinking.  I look at this as the info we need for free agency.  Looks like we are going to free up about $10m so far; watch to see if any contracts (Moehrig, Horn, Brown, etc) are reworked the first week of March.  Then after free agency, we will have a pretty good idea. Right now, to be fair to your question because I am sure you are aware of its timing: In free agency, I see us adding an OT of some sort and drafting one at some point.  It all depends on how they view Ickey, Nijman, and maybe BC.  That OT could be Nijman.  I do not see the future OT--just a stop gap. I see the Panthers signing a free-agent center.  I think the market is strong.  I see Fortner from the Saints as a prime candidate and his salary is estimated at $6m by Spotrac.  the Saints are $42m over the cap, so I doubt they are able to re-sign many of their own.  He will be 28.  I also expect them to re-sign Corbett (depth) at a vet min ($1.5m) deal. I also see free agency as a strong area to get a free safety who can play and is under age 30.  Hawkins, Cook, and Bryant are all around age 27-28, play at a high level, and should be had for about $15m per. EDGE: Arnold Ebiketie is a good value because he gets pressure at a high percentage.  He had 2 sacks and Atlanta just drafted 2 pass rushers last year.   He has a 70+ PFF rating and will (Spotrac) demand about $9m.  While he is not the answer, he is a great third down option with Princely and he would allow for Jones, Scourton, and Princely to develop.
×
×
  • Create New...