Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs planes thread


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I don't think I'm going to waste any more typing on this guy, he just keeps referring to "draft comparisons" and box line stats (which it should be noted that Svechnikov would go #1 overall in a 2018 hindsight draft.

I wouldn’t waste anymore time either.  Its some dude named Matt. Dude gets angry at the drop of a hat. 

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

37 would a million percent go 1. No doubt 

Agreed, Floppin made another good point about the Ovi fight... At the time Svech was probably not even 180 pounds.... currently I'd guess he's up to about 210-215 and I'd be surprised if he doesn't get his playing weight up to around 225-230 he has the frame for it, when he does trust and believe he will be an unstoppable force.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

It's almost like we had a global pandemic that made his second and third seasons only have a combined 120 games.... And severely limited NHL practice... even this season *nope that totally wouldn't hinder any young players development*

 

Jespari K was drafted the pick after him....

You give off a preeminent vibe of someone who isn't a real hockey fan and/or is under the age of 18.

I brought facts/stats to an opinionated discussion. You brought excuses, and "he's young, he'll get better." to the discussion. Rough man. Rough. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I don't think I'm going to waste any more typing on this guy, he just keeps referring to "draft comparisons" and box line stats (which it should be noted that Svechnikov would go #1 overall in a 2018 hindsight draft.

Yeah, nothing like bringing facts/stats/and actual draft analysis for my reason why I look at him differently than you to a discussion about a guy instead of opinions and he's young. Watch out. Woof. This is horrific. 

Edited by NCTHFL0567
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Yeah, nothing like bringing facts/stats/and actual draft analysis for my reason why I look at him differently than you to a discussion about a guy instead of opinions and he's young. Watch out. Woof. This is horrific. 

Dude. The fact the 37 gets you this upset means you need to get out. Svech is the tits and you are THE ONLY PERSON that doesn’t like him. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Svech is a very good young player who we have signed for a long time. He’s shown progress and the ability to learn in all phases of his game. If someone was being reasonable point to a weak spot it’d be Necas but he’s just having a slump year and will go through the same progression as Svech. 
 

This team is not a 50 goal player team. It’s system is not design for that. You could take a 50 goal player and put them on our team and they drop down to Aho numbers. 
 

Simple facts are being overlooked in this conversation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Dude. The fact the 37 gets you this upset means you need to get out. Svech is the tits and you are THE ONLY PERSON that doesn’t like him. 

Hes going on my ignore list.... Dude very obviously doesn't watch hockey. His entire argument is "draft hype" and quite frankly his comparisons to other Russian players leads me to believe his hatred is due to nationality hate because of current world events.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Svech is a very good young player who we have signed for a long time. He’s shown progress and the ability to learn in all phases of his game. If someone was being reasonable point to a weak spot it’d be Necas but he’s just having a slump year and will go through the same progression as Svech. 
 

This team is not a 50 goal player team. It’s system is not design for that. You could take a 50 goal player and put them on our team and they drop down to Aho numbers. 
 

Simple facts are being overlooked in this conversation.

I broached that topic twice earlier in the thread, pointing out our system simply won't allow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think grades are fun, but they are extremely subjective. They player might be great, but the “grader” wanted a different position and vice versa. 
    • I'm not necessarily trying to be flippant, but Morgan has been telling you what type of team he's trying to to build. So, if you have no idea, you just haven't been listening. @ForJimmy explained it pretty well. But, if you don't believe that, then all you have to do is go back and listen to all of the pressers since Morgan was promoted. Then go back and listen to Dave Canales' pressers since he's been here. Don't forget to listen to the pressers during the draft. You're complaining because you don't agree with the player---or perhaps players that were drafted, the mail one being X. I have consistently said that they should draft the player with the most upside, and that you can't limit your draft based upon perceived limitations (especially perceived limitations based upon some fans) of your QB, particularly if the QB is unproven. X has the most upside, and he needs to be developed for sure, but what you obviously fail to realize is that all of the receivers that we could've picked were "projects," save for maybe Ladd who is smallish, has an injury history, and would have offered some redundancy with what we already have. Most people consider him a slot guy. We already have guys that can play in the slot.  If anything, our choices in the draft probably mean that Mingo is solidly in the long term plans. Whether he succeeds or not will be on him for the most part, as well as the coaches to put him in his best position to succeed. Regarding that, he likely needs to be transitioned to the slot where I'm pretty sure some teams (the Steelers being one of them) would have placed him in had he been available. What we also have is JT Sanders who will be another tough competitor on our side at the catch point. He is big-bodied with high upside, and will provide even another potential beast in the second and third level, and another consistent option for our QB (and any QB).  Morgan and Canales obvious put a premium on receivers that can make tough catches, but that doesn't mean that these guys can't be polished up and coached up where necessary. But even if I look at a worse case scenario, if a wideout can make a tough catch, in the mold of Alshon Jeffrey or even Tee Higgins, then YAC is not as important. But the fact is, that both of our newly drafted wideouts have upside to be YAC monsters. So many people were banging the table for a center. I've said it all the way through: apparently our FO on down believes that AC can be a proficient center. It s not like he hasn't played it before. Moreover, we found out (and some of us already knew) that BC could be a backup. Well that's the plan. Until proven otherwise, I'm going to have faith that Canales and Joe Gilbert (as well as Dan Morgan) know what they're doing in that regard. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that our O-line should at least be average. We'll find out, but I trust that this is not going to be an excuse for Bryce not to succeed in 2024. You've already seen the investment in the O-line, and in the offensive weapons. But Morgan also invested in the defense. We were decent last season, but inconsistent which lead to us being gashed. But the lack of offense also lead to the defense being gassed, which of course leads to being gashed as well. With the addition of the rookies and the additions of Robinson and Jewell, Fuller and of course Clowney and Wonnum, getting gashed in the run game will hopefully be a thing of the past. But the fact is that you can't fix everything in one offseason. However, if you can't see the plan and the vision, you just don't want to see it.   
×
×
  • Create New...