Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Good of a person is Cam..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Tyler Waves said:

Yeah so many people paint him as an asshole because of the trash talk and norman fight. What it boils down to is his competitiveness, same as Steve Smith. Two of the GOATs. 

Steve Smith was an asshole, violent and to quick with his mouth and hands around his teammates.

Cam just does his own thing and does no harm. Two different type people 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You know lots of businesses actually lose money...

...especially those owned by pro athletes who have lots of "family" members with snouts in the trough 😏.

Bet those articles don't discuss profitability huh 🤔?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

You know lots of businesses actually lose money...

...especially those owned by pro athletes who have lots of "family" members with snouts in the trough 😏.

Bet those articles don't discuss profitability huh 🤔?

Lmao.. I'm not arguing with you bro.  It's not worth

Dude is worth 75 million.. I know you're bigtime but for us regular folks that's generational wealth alone.. 

Dude has a Productions company, clothing line, a hot cigar bar, thriving internet presence, buying into a 7v7 league for high schooler (side note do you know how much AAU basketball is worth) if he can get amateur football even close to that?? Whew!!

Not to mention again his foundation and other business ventures..

If you don't think he's got profitable businesses outside of football??

Okay 

Agree to disagree..

Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's quite literally just what he earned from contracts it doesn't include the endorsements, I think Cam will be just fine. 

The story had endorsement money in it as well.. 12mil on his biggest deal+ 122.5 mil is way short of "north of" 200mil.. Unless under armour Danon and Gatorade paid him 50 to 70 mill together it's going to come up a little short of 200 mil

Cam Newton Endorsements

 

Being a popular rising athlete, Cam Newton landed many endorsement deals with major brands such as Gatorade, Beats by Dre, Under Armour, Danon and Blek. According to Forbes, his deal with sportswear brand Under Armour earns him approximately $12 million, which includes a profit from every pair of cleats sold.

 

Newton lost his endorsement deal with yogurt brand Danon after he reportedly made a sexist remark against a female reporter during a press conference in 2017. Despite this, he continues to earn millions through ads

 

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

. CAM NEWTON

Value of largest endorsement dealOver $1 million per year with Under Armor

Total estimated value of all endorsements: $12 million from Under Armor, Gatorade, Danon, Beats, Belk and Electronic Arts

The exact value of Newton’s 2011 Under Armor deal hasn’t been revealed, but it is reportedly one of the most lucrative deals ever agreed to by an NFL player, with several sources reporting he earns more than $1 million per year from the sports apparel manufacturer. They extended their deal with Newton in 2015, making him their top-paid NFL endorser. Injuries caused Newton to miss much of the 2019 season, with rumors spreading that he’ll be traded in 2020.

Feb 2020

https://opendorse.com/blog/top-10-most-lucrative-nfl-endorsement-deals/

That's a long way from north of 200mil..

Unless in 2 years he cleared 70mil

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

. CAM NEWTON

Value of largest endorsement dealOver $1 million per year with Under Armor

Total estimated value of all endorsements: $12 million from Under Armor, Gatorade, Danon, Beats, Belk and Electronic Arts

The exact value of Newton’s 2011 Under Armor deal hasn’t been revealed, but it is reportedly one of the most lucrative deals ever agreed to by an NFL player, with several sources reporting he earns more than $1 million per year from the sports apparel manufacturer. They extended their deal with Newton in 2015, making him their top-paid NFL endorser. Injuries caused Newton to miss much of the 2019 season, with rumors spreading that he’ll be traded in 2020.

Feb 2020

https://opendorse.com/blog/top-10-most-lucrative-nfl-endorsement-deals/

That's a long way from north of 200mil..

An average of 12m... Per year...  But I don't care enough to continue hence I concede.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/boardroom.tv/cam-newton-brand-value/amp/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

Ha ha man Cam at his prime was amazing. When I get depressed I'll often re-watch some 2015 games, specifically the Arizona playoff game. 

 

But dude come on... Cam could stiff arm DE's and truck stick LB's. CB's just got out of the way!! 😝

Oh yeah true he would absolutely steam roll linebackers and make defensive ends his bitch! God I miss those days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

That's quite literally just what he earned from contracts it doesn't include the endorsements, I think Cam will be just fine. 

The list of broke/bankrupt athletes with $100M+ of contractual earnings + other endorsement income...

...is very long.

The common troublesome themes are:

1.  Large entourage of family/friends with snouts in the trough.

2.  Multiple children with multiple women.  

3.  Businesses with family/friends on payroll.

4.  Conspicuous consumption of  high-ticket luxury cars/homes/jewelry, etc...

5.  Bad investments in long-shot business ideas...

...for starters 👍

 

PS:  Remember, the agent and the tax-man take a whopping cut of all those headline income-numbers and Cam's take is significantly less...

 

BE5F2896-CCFD-4290-96EC-20B72945A565.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

The list of broke/bankrupt athletes with $100M+ of contractual earnings + other endorsement income...

...is very long.

The common troublesome themes are:

1.  Large entourage of family/friends with snouts in the trough.

2.  Multiple children with multiple women.  

3.  Businesses with family/friends on payroll.

4.  Conspicuous consumption of  high-ticket luxury cars/homes/jewelry, etc...

5.  Bad investments in long-shot business ideas...

...for starters 👍

 

PS:  Remember, the agent and the tax-man take a whopping cut of all those headline income-numbers and Cam's take is significantly less...

 

BE5F2896-CCFD-4290-96EC-20B72945A565.jpeg

I'm well aware I just didn't feel like arguing it lol. Warren Sapp Mark Brunell Clinton Portis Bernie Kosar.... to name a few.

 

I wasn't going to point out that none of those investments fall into the category of a "need" industry and not a "want".

 

I just meant that if he hires a proper investing organization now he will probably never go broke.

Edited by TrevorLaurenceTime22
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...