Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NHL Playoff Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

My brother-in-law is a huge Ranger homer and thinks the Rangers and Calgary will be in the final. Says Canes will lose to Boston in 7.

NY loses in 3OT- that's gonna be a difficult get-back for Shesterkin- he's probably wiped out. But both Pens and Rangers are essentially 2-line teams, and the Pens have the weaker GT.

That series could go 6 or 7 games and they'll be drained because they have no depth.

Edited by Anybodyhome
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

My brother-in-law is a huge Ranger homer and thinks the Rangers and Calgary will be in the final. Says Canes will lose to Boston in 7.

NY loses in 3OT- that's gonna be a difficult get-back for Shesterkin- he's probably wiped out. But both Pens and Rangers are essentially 2-line teams, and the Pens have the weaker GT.

That series could go 6 or 7 games and they'll be drained because they have no depth.

My brother-in-law is a Stars fan and he hasn't said a word to me all season. Wonder why? LOL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Panthers kicking the caps ass 4-1 

 

Rangers beating Pens 3-2 

Ya looks like the panthers finally turned “it” on. I don’t see them breaking the caps though like we broke Boston though.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...