Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Rhule needs to read this and figure out a plan

 

How is it that Willis, the biggest project in the draft coming from a gimmick college system has worked himself from 3rd string to 2nd?   Now are you guys really saying MC is a bigger project then willis?

 

its like magic, the more the give Willis the better he is getting.  Amazing how that works

 

Just like with pickett, both had some bad weeks in training camp but the team had a plan to get them up to speed.  I cannot say the same thing for dumb dumb rhule

 

https://titanswire.usatoday.com/2022/08/04/malik-willis-titans-qbs-coach-assessment/

Thought Pickett  like Jones last year were considered the most pro ready while Corral was considered a project. Apples and oranges

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

If he is the backup as you advocate then any injury to the starter makes him the starter.

No one with brain cells is even advocating for Corral to be the backup…

The point is, the QB1 competition should have been long over (along with the OL competition). Dragging it out this long makes the team look inept and is not helping the players in the slightest.

The first game should have gone very similar to the way the Titans handled their reps. Corral gets a lot of reps early and then the backup (Darnold or Walker) comes in during the third or fourth quarter.

The next game, QB1 comes in and plays the entire first half with the first team OL, the backup (wether it be Darnold or Walker) then comes in and plays the third and Corral comes in and plays the fourth.

The final game, the backup (Darnold or Walker) plays the first half and Corral plays the second half…

This isn’t some sort of rocket science and it’s also not some sort of plot to make Corral QB1. It’s about maximizing reps for everyone in a short period of time.

Instead, we are going into game two with our thumb up our asses and no idea who the starting QB, backup QB, or the starting OL is.. meanwhile, your HC is out here spewing stupid poo like, you only get better with reps but you have to produce with the reps you are given (which is a contradictory statement and impossible if you are looking at a rookie QB who is starting from ground zero).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Seems we have covered this already. You need 2 guys who can start in this league since both Baker and Sam missed games last year. And Corral is getting what he can handle. You need to be on the sidelines until you know what to do when you get on the field. The hype was great physicals but didn't operate in a prostyle offense.. They are doing him a favor bringing him along slowly.

Baker is the starter. Sam is the backup.  That’s your two. 

what spot is PJ realistically competing for? 

Corral is getting the reps Rhule is willing to give him because of the mess ahead of him.   

Name a 3rd round pick in recent history that walked into being an immediate 4th stringer with no reps in training camp. But I guess your argument is most likely to be fired Rhule has a better master plan than everyone else for how to do things.  Or maybe that Corral shouldn’t of been a 3rd round pick and was over drafted. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB MATT CORRAL

On what he will takeaway from his first NFL game:

"We just had to have better communication. Regardless of who's out there, we always say we want to play completely clear and concise with complete communication. We were all over the place out there."


This just screams that we have a rookie QB that’s not being developed properly. Corral should have been put in positions in practice to work on communication, instead he was getting three reps a day.

If you can’t manage a QB competition and a QB’s development at the same time then you don’t need to be an NFL head coach, plain and simple.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

No one with brain cells is even advocating for Corral to be the backup…

The point is, the QB1 competition should have been long over (along with the OL competition). Dragging it out this long makes the team look inept and is not helping the players in the slightest.

The first game should have gone very similar to the way the Titans handled their reps. Corral gets a lot of reps early and then the backup (Darnold or Walker) comes in during the third or fourth quarter.

The next game, QB1 comes in and plays the entire first half with the first team OL, the backup (wether it be Darnold or Walker) then comes in and plays the third and Corral comes in and plays the fourth.

The final game, the backup (Darnold or Walker) plays the first half and Corral plays the second half…

This isn’t some sort of rocket science and it’s also not some sort of plot to make Corral QB1. It’s about maximizing reps for everyone in a short period of time.

Instead, we are going into game two with our thumb up our asses and no idea who the starting QB, backup QB, or the starting OL is.. meanwhile, your HC is out here spewing stupid poo like, you only get better with reps but you have to produce with the reps you are given (which is a contradictory statement and impossible if you are looking at a rookie QB who is starting from ground zero).

You are another one who doesn't get it. Baker and Darnold are getting starter reps because they are going to be QB1 and QB2 and we need 2 starters since they both have injury histories. And Corral is a project who isn't the focus with Rhule's focus on winning now. Seems obvious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

You are another one who doesn't get it. Baker and Darnold are getting starter reps because they are going to be QB1 and QB2 and we need 2 starters since they both have injury histories. And Corral is a project who isn't the focus with Rhule's focus on winning now. Seems obvious. 

is corral a bigger project then Malik willis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Baker is the starter. Sam is the backup.  That’s your two. 

what spot is PJ realistically competing for? 

Corral is getting the reps Rhule is willing to give him because of the mess ahead of him.   

Name a 3rd round pick in recent history that walked into being an immediate 4th stringer with no reps in training camp. But I guess your argument is most likely to be fired Rhule has a better master plan than everyone else for how to do things. 

Who follows the reps that a third stringer gets? Who cares if he sits on the bench what happens. Again why all the focus in a project. Did Greer generate pages of back and forth??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panthers55 said:

Who follows the reps that a third stringer gets? Who cares if he sits on the bench what happens. Again why all the focus in a project. Did Greer generate pages of back and forth??

grier sucked but at least he was given a chance.  Multiple chances in fact.  We didnt draft him and then ship his ass to the 4rth string

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • you seen our Dline, they wont have time to throw, who needs a CB.     Just Kidding
    • Our Panthers reporter, Anthony Rizutti of Panthers Wire provides us with a few grades. I've added a couple of more snippets of analyses from some NC guys, including our friend Scott Fowler in Charlotte and a vid from Panthers Playbook's Dennis Cox and Chris Lea in Raleigh. It is food for thought. Of course we all have our opinions, but, me personally, I tend to giive the opinion of hardcore fans and people that actually follow the team a little more weight.  Touchdown Wire:     B Draft Wire:                B+ USA Today:               C NFL.com:                  B ESPN:                        B- PFF:                          C Yahoo Sports:          C CBS Sports:             C+ If you want to read their little summaries, hit the link. But as you can see, the national types have largely graded the draft average. There seems to be an acknowledgement of the fact that Morgan and company were in a hard place due to the malfeasance of the previous administrations, but that our FO did the best it could. One of the "experts" mentioned the "boom-or-bust" nature of our draft, which is an interesting way to characterize it, but I'm good with that. And Charles McDonald may have put it best which basically alluded to the fact that so much of the grade is simply based upon the unknown: "Even though they’re getting a C, it’s hard not to be caught by the allure of the unknown here. It’s a really interesting class." https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/lists/panthers-nfl-draft-grades-experts-2024/   Tony Pauline, another national talking head, took his page straight out Debbie Downer's playbook, but it's all about perspective, right? Here's a bone for those that are decidedly negative about the outcome: "You could brand the Panthers as this year’s losers before the event began, considering they frittered away the first pick of the draft last year to select Bryce Young. Trading up one spot for the final selection of Round 1 to select Xavier Legette, a Day 2 receiver prospect, kept things going in the wrong direction for Carolina."   One person who has been---perhaps what has been perceived as negative about the direction of the franchise---decidedly sober-minded and what I consider fair about the way things have been going under the Tepper era has been Scott Fowler. By now, everyone should have heard of the contentious relationship that he and David Tepper have. Fowler has called Tepper out on his decided malfeasance (labelling it inTeptitude as I recall), and Tepper, the owner that is a somewhat contentious all own his own by the simplest of "slights," has outwardly acted inappropriate (in my opinion, toward Fowler. But Fowler was decidedly positive about this year's draft. "While nationally the Panthers didn’t get nearly the same amount of attention in this draft as they did in 2023, owing to the controversial big-splash trade and the ensuing selection of Young a year ago, this group may be more significant as a whole." Fowler gave the draft a B+ "This team is going to be more exciting. In particular, I have high hopes for Legette and Sanders. Carolina didn’t get everything it wanted — an edge rusher in the first two days of the draft would have been nice, for instance. But overall, I’m giving the Panthers a grade of B+ for the 2024 NFL Draft. Which, given the team as a whole got an F last year, is quite an upgrade." You may hit a paywall:https://www.heraldonline.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article287830040.html#storylink=cpy   And finally, here is Dennis Cox And Chris Lea. I thought they were fair and thoughtful in their assessment. They call Dan and Dave (and company) "The Alignment," because of being on the same page.  For me, that alone, is worth the listen.  
    • I honestly don't really care. This year is all about figuring out if Bryce is it. Period. Because if we have another high pick next year (pretty likely if we're being honest) we need to know if we need a QB.
×
×
  • Create New...