Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is one way to solve the battery issue for some electric vehicles


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Figure out a system that can absorb the energy from hitting potholes in South Carolina and convert that into electricity and forget EVs, you could solve ALL the world's energy issues.

My spine feels like it absorbed two Hiroshimas and a Nagasaki worth of energy from taking the hits SC's "roads" delivered this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@toldozer there are physical limitations to battery technology and energy storage techniques. 

 

Yes, a battery might be charged to 80%, but aside from that not being 100%, there are safety and heat issues to consider.

Time and research would be better spent in making battery usage more efficient with the devices/vehicles using them, along with changing todays technology perception of whether a battery needs to go in everything in general.    (Not everything needs to be turned into a smart device, is the point here)

Battery tech hasn't changed much in the past 50 years. You can shove more kwh down the pipe to be able to produce stories like you've shared... but physical battery energy storage has its own limitations 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/26/2022 at 6:34 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

We have a massive housing affordability issue and now we want EV charging stations included in new construction driving up costs even more when EVs are still a very tiny percentage of the vehicles on the road? That's asinine.

If you have an EV and you want to add a charging station, then do it. Seems simple enough.

California wants to ban selling gas vehicles by 2035.

California currently has rolling blackouts because they can't keep up with electric demands.

California has some stupid fuc#ing people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 100%. He's a serviceable starter but not a shut down CB by any means. Not too bad for $5.25M /year.
    • Crap on a cracker! I didn't see that from the original video. That's nasty.
    • It is like he just can’t be bothered with that stuff.    But seriously, rebuilding your entire physical operating procedure is so difficult that very few can do it. You have to get it in you so deep that you don’t think about it. Most people fall back to their comfort zone at the biggest moments. Because it worked for them up until ‘now’ and they don’t have to think about it.  You would think people would know this but here we are.  His so obviously wack unorthodox mechanics screamed to me that a rebuild would be necessary and that the single biggest reason I was so opposed to taking him.  It plays out all the time. He is in and out of what Canales tried to train him to do. That’s what the emphasis on 1 2 3 plant throw was about last offseason, as much as it was about getting the ball out quicker. But it is all connected.  You just can’t get the ball out that fast with his old routine, slows you down. 
×
×
  • Create New...