Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will David Tepper admit he made a mistake when he finally fires Matt Rhule?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Thorrez said:

Stop pretending like it was a choice between a success and a failure. The other hot hire in the cycle was Judge, and a assume that is not what you call a success?

Mediocre team without a QB in a division the Tom Brady decided to make his home. Tell me ove available coach he should have hired that would have been a success before you start to tell about admitting mistakes. Sometime all your options are shitty.

And if you think I'll defending Rhule, reread the first sentence.

The candidates they interviewed were:

Mike McCarthy, Josh McDaniels, Eric Bieniemy, and Kevin Stefanski.

Who else was available at that time? Well a lot of people, but this is who they interviewed. To be honest I think any of them would have been better than Rhule. All of them had significant NFL experience at the time and could have put together an NFL caliber staff. Rhule's biggest drawback was his lack of NFL experience and connections. The 2020 Panthers went into the season with two coordinators who had never called plays at the NFL level, including an OC who had never called plays whatsoever. No wonder it was a failure.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The candidates they interviewed were:

Mike McCarthy, Josh McDaniels, Eric Bieniemy, and Kevin Stefanski.

Who else was available at that time? Well a lot of people, but this is who they interviewed. To be honest I think any of them would have been better than Rhule. All of them had significant NFL experience at the time and could have put together an NFL caliber staff. Rhule's biggest drawback was his lack of NFL experience and connections. The 2020 Panthers went into the season with two coordinators who had never called plays at the NFL level, including an OC who had never called plays whatsoever. No wonder it was a failure.

Any of those guys would have been better than Rhule. 

and if you wanted to lure someone out of college, Matt Rhule wouldn't of made the top of my list there either.    

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

The candidates they interviewed were:

Mike McCarthy, Josh McDaniels, Eric Bieniemy, and Kevin Stefanski.

Who else was available at that time? Well a lot of people, but this is who they interviewed. To be honest I think any of them would have been better than Rhule. All of them had significant NFL experience at the time and could have put together an NFL caliber staff. Rhule's biggest drawback was his lack of NFL experience and connections. The 2020 Panthers went into the season with two coordinators who had never called plays at the NFL level, including an OC who had never called plays whatsoever. No wonder it was a failure.

McDaniels would be the win here, if he would have accepted and we didn't offer that would be the real mistake. Picking Rhule over the rest of the bunch of not a worse bet than any other, although did turn out worse.

I agree with your other point, he should have been forced to pick a former head coach as coordinator just to learn the basics from.

Edited by Thorrez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hepcat said:

The candidates they interviewed were:

Mike McCarthy, Josh McDaniels, Eric Bieniemy, and Kevin Stefanski.

Who else was available at that time? Well a lot of people, but this is who they interviewed. To be honest I think any of them would have been better than Rhule. All of them had significant NFL experience at the time and could have put together an NFL caliber staff. Rhule's biggest drawback was his lack of NFL experience and connections. The 2020 Panthers went into the season with two coordinators who had never called plays at the NFL level, including an OC who had never called plays whatsoever. No wonder it was a failure.

McDaniels was a candidate but they never actually interviewed him (don't I wish).

They did interview Nick Caserio but he took the Texans job something like a day after he talked to us. As I recall, McDaniels was scheduled to come in the day after Rhule but...well, you know how that turned out 🙄

Not sure they ever actually interviewed Stefanski either, honestly. I think he was scheduled to come in the following week but again...Rhule.

The worst part of that cycle was that McDaniels actually could have been in a lot sooner but Belichick dicked around and delayed him from being free to interview. Lot of folks think that was deliberate, and knowing Belichick they're probably right.

Pretty sure I'd laugh my head off if McDaniels runs up the score, dismantles Mac Jones and shoves a nasty loss up Belichick's ass the next time the Raiders play the Pats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a tremendous amount negative attention applied towards Rhule and Tepper. I'm not saying it's deserving or not, but to me, the constant attention and mentions of it isn't. Tepper's the owner and Rhule is the coach, throwing this and that at them every other post is pointless. It seems to me that many of you come here just to criticize everything Panther. This player is that, that player is this. He should be cut, he should be fired. Blah, blah, blah. Is this how yall want to start the season? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

There's a tremendous amount negative attention applied towards Rhule and Tepper. I'm not saying it's deserving or not, but to me, the constant attention and mentions of it isn't. Tepper's the owner and Rhule is the coach, throwing this and that at them every other post is pointless. It seems to me that many of you come here just to criticize everything Panther. This player is that, that player is this. He should be cut, he should be fired. Blah, blah, blah. Is this how yall want to start the season? 

Mentioned it before, but I don't approach the season with a plan to be a certain "way".

You could have all the positive feelings in the world about Sam Darnold if you want to. It's not gonna make him any better.

Likewise, you've got fans who for whatever reason don't care for Baker Mayfield. Is that gonna affect his performance? Seriously doubt it.

So bottom line for me? I'm neither gonna give myself false hope by happy talking the bad stuff nor deny that at least the offense looks potentially improved from the personnel side.

What does it all mean?

Ask me in a couple of weeks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Don't think those folks are particularly interested in the actual game day. It's a soap opera for them.

Hell, we have some dumbasses on here who hardly ever even talk about football at all. They just spend all their time talking about other posters instead. Pretty much nobody likes those guys or wants them on board but they keep coming back as if they think people like them.

Those attention needy drama queens really aren't worth sh-t.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

There's a tremendous amount negative attention applied towards Rhule and Tepper. I'm not saying it's deserving or not, but to me, the constant attention and mentions of it isn't. Tepper's the owner and Rhule is the coach, throwing this and that at them every other post is pointless. It seems to me that many of you come here just to criticize everything Panther. This player is that, that player is this. He should be cut, he should be fired. Blah, blah, blah. Is this how yall want to start the season? 

It's what a fanbase looks like after 4 straight losing seasons featuring miserable long losing streaks.

The team has been mismanaged at almost every turn since Tepper bought the team. Every year there is massive turnover on the coaching staff and a new starting QB. There are legitimate questions if the owner's involvement in the football operations of the team is doing more harm than good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hepcat said:

It's what a fanbase looks like after 4 straight losing seasons featuring miserable long losing streaks.

The team has been mismanaged at almost every turn since Tepper bought the team. Every year there is massive turnover on the coaching staff and a new starting QB. There are legitimate questions if the owner's involvement in the football operations of the team is doing more harm than good. 

That;s really not a difficult thing to understand...or shouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mentioned it before, but I don't approach the season with a plan to be a certain "way".

You could have all the positive feelings in the world about Sam Darnold if you want to. It's not gonna make him any better.

Likewise, you've got fans who for whatever reason don't care for Baker Mayfield. Is that gonna affect his performance? Seriously doubt it.

So bottom line for me? I'm neither gonna give myself false hope by happy talking the bad stuff nor deny that at least the offense looks potentially improved from the personnel side.

What does it all mean?

Ask me in a couple of weeks.

 

Understandable, it just erks me to read negative post after post about the same team and players that they say they support with little to no supporting words mentioned in their posts...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hepcat said:

It's what a fanbase looks like after 4 straight losing seasons featuring miserable long losing streaks.

The team has been mismanaged at almost every turn since Tepper bought the team. Every year there is massive turnover on the coaching staff and a new starting QB. There are legitimate questions if the owner's involvement in the football operations of the team is doing more harm than good. 

Yeah because every billionaire can buy an NFL team and manage to completly turn it around, from top to bottom in 5 years. I believe our team is better now than it was when Tepper purchased it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...