Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where the CMC choice routes that made Darnold look good?


restNChrist
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

That offense last year with cmc healthy for the first 3-4 games was humming.  This offense with cmc healthy is shitt sandwich. 

Against 3 shitty teams who  2 ended up with a worst record.. Yes let's keep acting like those 3 games were a revelation..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Wait wait wait..

No adjustments ever in 20+ games.. Do you ppl not remember??

Oline not good?? Why keep calling 7 and 5 step drop plays?? Do you not remember??

How about 3 games he called the same play 7x and it didn't work the 1st 6.. Do you ppl not remember..

How about the 5 games where it looked like the defense was running our WR routes..  Honest at 1st I blamed Darnold for bad decisions and throwing kill balls.. But it happened to every QB who played.. Db's around every pass play?? Defense calling out our route scheme when we lined up.. That's not QB that's the play designer/caller.. Brady was such a genius the NFl figured him out in 7 games... Do ppl not remember this??

personal can make or break how good a coordinator looks. yes he wasnt perfect  not saying brady was a ogfensive mastermind. but his plays look much more creative that this crap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

personal can make or break how good a coordinator looks. yes he wasnt perfect  not saying brady was a ogfensive mastermind. but his plays look much more creative that this crap. 

It did the 1st 7 games.. But after that no it didn’t.. And some OC with weak personal find away.. Atlanta personal is crap but they are scoring points under Arthur Smith..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

It did the 1st 7 games.. But after that no it didn’t.. And some OC with weak personal find away.. Atlanta personal is crap but they are scoring points under Arthur Smith..

i dunno they have some very versatile chess peices. mariota might not be the best but he can move and extend plays. patterson as well. Pitts is a freak..  drake london looks legit as well... they have weapons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

i dunno they have some very versatile chess peices. mariota might not be the best but he can move and extend plays. patterson as well. Pitts is a freak..  drake london looks legit as well... they have weapons.

Their Oline is meh and lets be real Patterson wasn’t a chess piece anywhere else.. So Smith should get credit for that.. 

And they still have less weapons then Brady had to be real..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Lmao.. ppl seriously don't remember last year at all..

 

22 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Lmao.. ppl seriously don't remember last year at all..

I think Brady had more creativity in the route tree and spacing for our key players. The problem last year was Brady called the same plays over and over. That became predictable. Hopefully Macadoo has more rabbits in his magic hat. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL might never reach his full potential here but I think he does have a legitimate shot at becoming a pretty good #2-3. We knew when we picked him that he was raw but his athletic traits were hard to pass on.  I still remember coming here and telling 85% of huddlers to not give up on DB yet after his first couple of years here.  I just knew DB was going to special. I wouldn't put XL in that exact same category but I wouldn't write him off yet. I think our playcalling is also working against his strengths.  At the very least, we should have a servicable #3 receiver w/ speed between XL, Horn Jr, and Meetchie. 
    • I think we haven't praised Morgan/tilis enough. In this thread we have some huddles best and its hard to figure out what to do with the 19th pick, if you understand that. Im also posting what "I" believe they are doing and what I feel is best. Those FA signess send a clear signal- They are going all-in to win this coming season. If you factor that in, just believe it first, it 100% changes what going on with pick 19, cause 51st pick doesn't matter as the talent level drop is petty big between the two. So 19 is the biggest difference maker on the current plan of all-in for the 2026.  Then you factor in who will be there at, (I better hold off on my other strong thought here- I think trade up is the best help too, yes using that 3rd to do so too...) DT, ILB(Allen? he didn't run), OC, QB(ooo my I don't want to rage drool my hate again about how I feel here, plus F it draft TY simp not joking)....... those 4 groups don't have the "BPA" at 19. You can add ILB Hill in there, but I feel 19 just is too high, other disagree.  Slot or TE it is......Kenyon is the only TE worth a 1st and he's the classic draft dilemma- All sort of he's a top ten lock to he's a non-blocking one trick WR that's not even worth 2nd currency. Then there's he's the clear winner from the TE group, thus increases his value more no matter the opinion.  Honestly I see the Matt Millen outcome as the current odds favorite, I think the huddle would go bonkers for weeks as result......just the truth tho, WR had the highest odds to be the clear BPA and slot is a need...plus if we are talking about Walker being a one year deal, Coker is a one year too(he may have another controll yr, I got to confirm it tho). Plus God forbid Tmac gets hurt, the drop in talent from him or Coker to Moore is fuging scary, I'd say more than the recent OT stone fellow. It goes back back to adding talent no matter what, draft now help, and where are  the weak points are in the system you want to run....  
    • good for him...but bigger is realizing that we are starting to develop talent to the point that when our FA's hit the market, teams ACTUALLY want them.  hasnt been that way in a minute.
×
×
  • Create New...