Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral

Stuart Smith

By Stuart Smith,
in 2015 NFL Draft

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

No burrow available...upgrade OL.

Who are you wanted to draft to replace who on the OL?? We have a rookie LT who looks the part and Moton is a lock for RT with his contract and performance. So you are spending a first to upgrade one of the 2 solid OGs or a C? If we extend Bozeman a C isn’t needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Who are you wanted to draft to replace who on the OL?? We have a rookie LT who looks the part and Moton is a lock for RT with his contract and performance. So you are spending a first to upgrade one of the 2 solid OGs or a C? If we extend Bozeman a C isn’t needed.

Yes upgrade inside and you have better line with solid depth.yes im spending a first on that for sure. Skoronski. Best lineman in the draft. Instead of a hit or miss qb I prefer  building the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Varking said:

Not at all. There’s a large gap between Darnold and Burrow. 

Yes.my pt exactly.upgrading over Arnold wasnt your argument, Burrow was , and again no Burrow available. You set Burrow as the standard.Back to pt , better to elevatethe line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, heel31ok said:

Yes upgrade inside and you have better line with solid depth.yes im spending a first on that for sure. Skoronski. Best lineman in the draft. Instead of a hit or miss qb I prefer  building the line.

Any GM that considers drafting IOL in the top 10 should get fired.

With the possible exception of a good team holding that pick due to a prior trade with an obvious need at IOL. But a team that's there because they suck cannot afford to spend a premium pick like that on IOL. That's worse than picking a RB 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Any GM that considers drafting IOL in the top 10 should get fired.

With the possible exception of a good team holding that pick due to a prior trade with an obvious need at IOL. But a team that's there because they suck cannot afford to spend a premium pick like that on IOL. That's worse than picking a RB 

Drafting best lineman is always a good consideration, especially when the qb situation doesnt offer you that franchise player you need.Building a great line improves the whole offense. Thats not fireable or debatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      OK, I'll apologize...somewhat

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, I think you're being a little hyperbolic with the last statement, but point taken. 
    • X-Clown
      Incredibly proud of this team

      By X-Clown · Posted

      Pass rush was the biggest issue in tonight’s game, and we were tied for 28th in sacks this season. That is a major area of need that has to get addressed this offseason. I just don’t see a path where there’s a game changing QB you can bring in with where we are drafting and quality of veterans that will be available. We certainly can do better than Dalton as a backup, and should ideally have a developmental guy  (perhaps a day 3 pick this year). We have bryce for one more year on a reasonable contract and then I think 2027 is the year that you reset that position (unless he massively improves).
    • Carolina Cajun
      Icky

      By Carolina Cajun · Posted

      Agreed, honestly basically bringing this group back as a healthy unit would be alright.  Brady Christensen should be resigned to a very reasonable deal with him recovering from the Achilles.  Atleast we're alright at 4 of our 5 spots with Lewis, Mays, Hunt, and Moton, Nijman was decent.  While if we can snag a deal on someone, take a stab, however our resources need to go to Linebacker, Pass Rush and a real option outside Tmac (coker is amazing, but if we can get someone who isnt braindead opposite Tmac, we can fully unleash Coker AND Tmacs full potential, cant move him into the slot if racoon boy is out there licking doorknobs).
×
×
  • Create New...