Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why aren't we acquiring compensatory picks?


DMathematics
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

The combination of negativity on this board mixed with idiots like OP is why I’ve cut my huddle time back by about 85% 

Theres a few brilliant posters in here but they get drowned out by the trolls. Unnecessarily bringing up nonsensical ideas relating to the team, political garbage to insight a reaction, or simply spamming the “Tepper, Rhule bad” narrative as though we are all unaware of what a disaster the team has become. 
 

Meh. The huddle has turned pretty stale. 

how am I an idiot for pointing out the panthers can't figure out comp picks? 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DMathematics said:

how am I an idiot for pointing out the panthers can't figure out comp picks? 

You aren’t. You’re an idiot for just about every other point you’ve tried to make to defend your position. When someone points out pass blocking grades or run defense grades for players you call garbage and ask what metrics you are using and you say “uh, we are 1-2” then you’ve ironically made the least mathematical stance possible and it shows that you know much less about the subject than the ones you are debating with. 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

You aren’t. You’re an idiot for just about every other point you’ve tried to make to defend your position. When someone points out pass blocking grades or run defense grades for players you call garbage and ask what metrics you are using and you say “uh, we are 1-2” then you’ve ironically made the least mathematical stance possible and it shows that you know much less about the subject than the ones you are debating with. 

He has been too busy looking through every topic on the hockey forum to poo me 🤣

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

You aren’t. You’re an idiot for just about every other point you’ve tried to make to defend your position. When someone points out pass blocking grades or run defense grades for players you call garbage and ask what metrics you are using and you say “uh, we are 1-2” then you’ve ironically made the least mathematical stance possible and it shows that you know much less about the subject than the ones you are debating with. 

Well firstly, thank you for replying to me honestly and thoughtfully I really appreciate that. 

Now back to the topic at hand If you are using  pff stats and metrics 3 games into the season I can't go for that we need an ample amount of sample data to do that if you wanna go off last years stats then okay but off 3 games? A lot can change. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMathematics said:

Well firstly, thank you for replying to me honestly and thoughtfully I really appreciate that. 

Now back to the topic at hand If you are using  pff stats and metrics 3 games into the season I can't go for that we need an ample amount of sample data to do that if you wanna go off last years stats then okay but off 3 games? A lot can change. 

It sure can. But if calling them solid players after 3 games is premature then calling them trash after 3 games is as well. Especially when you consider that through a small sample size they have actually been decent.

And for the record, I am over this coaching staff, but we could very easily be 3-0 right now. We gifted the Giants 6 points early in a game we lost marginally and we were on the wrong side of two atrocious calls that allowed the Browns to kick a 57 yard winner.

With a half competent coaching staff this team is undefeated right now. The players on the roster aren’t the problem. They may not be super bowl contenders but with decent coaching, there’s enough talent on this roster to be a playoff team. It’s the clowns calling the plays that are holding us back currently. Trashing our roster seems silly to me.

Yes we have been bad about compensatory pick accumulation. But that isn’t as important when you lose those picks because you signed productive players.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...