Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rhule worse than Seifert?


Who was worse  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. .

    • George Seifert
      11
    • Matt Rhule
      58


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Why did you come at me stating you had stats to prove that 2010 and 2022 were worse than 2001? When now your comment is basicaly is just conjecture? I dont understand the premise of doing that.....

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

Edited by TheCasillas
so many typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Well that's something we can both agree on. 🍻

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...