Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills reach out about CMC


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Athletic's Jeff Howe writes the Panthers "aren’t actively trying to trade" Christian McCaffrey.

Rumors of McCaffrey's availability were inevitable after the Panthers fired Matt Rhule, but Howe says that not only is this happening, but that the Panthers aren't "stripping it down to the studs." Carolina will likely listen to offers that come in, but would have to be bowled over. It makes sense on paper to move McCaffrey and free up some cap space, but until the Panthers have their next head coach in the building and have a true direction, they may take things slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dxpanther said:

1st rounder and they cover rest of his contract

Not going to happen. If we trade him for a 1st then we are going to cover that money. I doubt we would get a first for a RB with a injury history and big contract. running backs don’t hold their value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, rmoneyg35 said:

Not going to happen. If we trade him for a 1st then we are going to cover that money. I doubt we would get a first for a RB with a injury history and big contract. running backs don’t hold their value.

just need to find a superbowl capable team that is a running back away. but yes, it's very much wishful thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...